Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating packages & dependencies to address Sec vulnerabilities #119

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 17, 2024

Conversation

mmassenzio
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmassenzio mmassenzio commented Mar 17, 2024

Summary by OpenAI

Release Notes:

  • Security Update: Updated packages and dependencies to address security vulnerabilities.

"Code secure, bugs no more,
Vulnerabilities shown the door.
Packages updated, code refined,
Security strengthened, peace of mind."

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 17, 2024

🤖 OpenAI

Thank you for letting me participate in the code review.

High-Level Summary:

The pull request focuses on updating packages and dependencies to address security vulnerabilities. Changes include updating import paths, replacing packages for consistency and security, handling errors, and updating base images and versions across various files.

File Summary
.run/Run all tests.run.xml, pkg/api/fsm.go Updated import paths for protobuf packages for consistency and security.
Makefile Updated version variable in Makefile.
docker/Dockerfile Updated base image in Dockerfile.
docker/grpc_health.go, docs/examples/sqs_client.go, fsm-cli/client/client.go, pkg/api/statemachine_test.go, pkg/internal/testing/containers.go, pkg/pubsub/pubsub_suite_test.go, pkg/pubsub/sqs_pub.go, pkg/pubsub/sqs_pub_test.go, pkg/pubsub/sqs_sub.go, pkg/storage/redis_store.go, pkg/storage/redis_store_test.go Various updates including package replacements, error handling, and version changes.

This summarizes the key changes made in the pull request.


Chat with 🤖 OpenAI Bot (@openai)

  • Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
  • Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging @openai in a reply.

Files ignored due to filter (2)

Ignored files

  • go.mod
  • go.sum

Copy link

🤖 OpenAI

Reviewing existing code in: fsm-cli/client/client.go

The existing code in the fsm-cli/client/client.go file looks mostly correct. However, there are a few issues and improvements that can be made:

  1. The use of insecure.NewCredentials() for TLS configuration is not recommended as it disables TLS security. It's better to use proper TLS configurations for secure communication.
  2. The error handling in the NewClient function can be improved by returning the error instead of returning nil.
  3. The Send method could benefit from more detailed error messages to provide better feedback to users.
  4. The Get method could have additional error handling for cases where the requested entity is not found.

Overall, the code seems well-structured and follows good practices. If you would like me to provide more detailed feedback or address specific areas, please let me know.

@@ -133,7 +132,7 @@ func (s *SqsSubscriber) ProcessMessage(msg *sqs.Message, queueUrl *string) {
return
}
var request protos.EventRequest
err := proto.UnmarshalText(*msg.Body, &request)
err := p.UnmarshalFromText(*msg.Body, &request)
if err != nil {
s.logger.Error("message %v has invalid body: %s", msg.MessageId, err.Error())
// TODO: publish error to DLQ.
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 OpenAI

The patch modifies the code in the ProcessMessage function of pkg/pubsub/sqs_sub.go file. It replaces a call to proto.UnmarshalText with p.UnmarshalFromText.

Ensure that the replacement method UnmarshalFromText behaves equivalently to proto.UnmarshalText and handles the message body correctly. Verify that this change does not introduce any new bugs or unexpected behavior.

Consider reviewing the implementation of UnmarshalFromText to confirm its correctness and compatibility with the existing code logic.

Please verify that the replacement method 'UnmarshalFromText' behaves equivalently to 'proto.UnmarshalText' and handles the message body correctly without introducing new bugs.

Please proceed with the next patch for review.

Copy link

🤖 OpenAI

Reviewing existing code in: docker/grpc_health.go

The existing code in the docker/grpc_health.go file looks mostly correct. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The usage of InsecureSkipVerify: true in the TLS configuration (tls.Config) is generally not recommended as it disables server certificate validation. It's important to ensure secure communication by properly verifying the server's certificate.

  2. The use of google.golang.org/grpc/credentials/insecure for creating insecure credentials should be used with caution, especially in production environments. It's better to use secure credentials whenever possible.

  3. The error handling could be improved by providing more descriptive error messages or logging additional context information when errors occur.

Overall, the code seems functional but could benefit from some security and error-handling enhancements. If you would like me to provide specific suggestions or modifications, please let me know.

"github.com/google/uuid"
"github.com/massenz/slf4go/logging"

protos "github.com/massenz/statemachine-proto/golang/api"
)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 OpenAI

The patch removes the import of github.com/golang/protobuf/proto from the file. This change seems fine as long as there are no references to proto from this package in the rest of the file. It's important to ensure that the removal of this import does not break any functionality related to protobuf handling.

I recommend verifying that there are no dependencies on proto from github.com/golang/protobuf/proto before finalizing this change.

Please verify that there are no dependencies on `proto` from `github.com/golang/protobuf/proto` in the file after removing the import.

Please proceed with the next patch for review.

@@ -63,7 +61,8 @@ var _ = Describe("SQS Publisher", func() {
// Emulate SQS Client behavior
body := *res.Body
var receivedEvt protos.EventResponse
Expect(proto.UnmarshalText(body, &receivedEvt)).Should(Succeed())
unmarshaler := pubsub.Base64ProtoMarshaler{}
Expect(unmarshaler.UnmarshalFromText(body, &receivedEvt)).Should(Succeed())
Expect(receivedEvt).To(Respect(notification))

close(notificationsCh)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 OpenAI

The patch replaces the usage of proto.UnmarshalText with a custom Base64ProtoMarshaler for unmarshaling in the test file. This change introduces a new custom unmarshaler, which could be beneficial for handling specific cases or improving code readability.

Ensure that the Base64ProtoMarshaler implementation is correct and handles the unmarshaling process appropriately. It's important to verify that this change does not introduce any regressions in the unmarshaling logic.

Please verify the correctness of the `Base64ProtoMarshaler` implementation and ensure that the unmarshaling process works as expected.

This patch looks acceptable with the provided context. Please proceed with the next patch for review.

g.Expect(proto.UnmarshalText(*res.Body, &receivedEvt)).Should(Succeed())
unmarshaler := pubsub.Base64ProtoMarshaler{}
g.Expect(unmarshaler.UnmarshalFromText(*res.Body,
&receivedEvt)).Should(Succeed())
g.Expect(receivedEvt.EventId).To(Equal(fmt.Sprintf("event-%d", i)))
g.Expect(receivedEvt.Outcome.Code).To(Equal(protos.EventOutcome_InternalError))
g.Expect(receivedEvt.Outcome.Details).To(Equal("more details about the error"))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 OpenAI

The patch introduces the usage of Base64ProtoMarshaler for unmarshaling in another part of the test file. This change seems consistent with the previous modification and maintains the custom unmarshaler approach.

As before, ensure that the Base64ProtoMarshaler implementation is correct and handles the unmarshaling process appropriately. Verify that this change does not introduce any issues related to unmarshaling or data consistency.

Please confirm that the `Base64ProtoMarshaler` is correctly implemented and continues to handle the unmarshaling process without issues.

This patch aligns with the previous changes and appears acceptable based on the provided context. Please proceed with the next patch for review.

Apparently moving to 1.44 to 1.51 for the AWS SDK causes
a decoding error of some sorts.
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

🤖 OpenAI

Reviewing existing code in: Makefile

The existing code in the Makefile looks well-structured and organized. Here are a few minor suggestions for improvement:

  1. Consider adding comments to explain complex commands or sections of the Makefile for better readability.
  2. Ensure consistent formatting throughout the file, especially regarding indentation and spacing.

Overall, the existing code seems to be in good shape. Feel free to ask if you need further assistance or have specific areas you would like me to review.

@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ import (
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/aws"
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/aws/session"
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/service/sqs"
"github.com/golang/protobuf/proto"
"github.com/massenz/go-statemachine/pkg/api"
log "github.com/massenz/slf4go/logging"
"os"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 OpenAI

The patch removes the import of "github.com/golang/protobuf/proto" from the pkg/pubsub/sqs_sub.go file.

This change suggests that the protobuf functionality previously used from this package is no longer needed or has been replaced by another method. It's important to ensure that this removal does not break any existing functionality that relied on the protobuf package.

Consider verifying if any code in the file depends on the removed package and update it accordingly. If the protobuf functionality is still required, ensure that it is imported from the correct package.

Please verify if any code in the file relies on the removed 'github.com/golang/protobuf/proto' package. Update the code accordingly if protobuf functionality is still needed.

Please proceed with the next patch for review.

@mmassenzio mmassenzio merged commit 81c3d76 into main Mar 17, 2024
5 checks passed
@mmassenzio mmassenzio deleted the fixing-vulns branch March 17, 2024 20:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants