-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updating packages & dependencies to address Sec vulnerabilities #119
Conversation
🤖 OpenAI Thank you for letting me participate in the code review. High-Level Summary:The pull request focuses on updating packages and dependencies to address security vulnerabilities. Changes include updating import paths, replacing packages for consistency and security, handling errors, and updating base images and versions across various files.
This summarizes the key changes made in the pull request. Chat with 🤖 OpenAI Bot (
|
🤖 OpenAI Reviewing existing code in: fsm-cli/client/client.go The existing code in the
Overall, the code seems well-structured and follows good practices. If you would like me to provide more detailed feedback or address specific areas, please let me know. |
@@ -133,7 +132,7 @@ func (s *SqsSubscriber) ProcessMessage(msg *sqs.Message, queueUrl *string) { | |||
return | |||
} | |||
var request protos.EventRequest | |||
err := proto.UnmarshalText(*msg.Body, &request) | |||
err := p.UnmarshalFromText(*msg.Body, &request) | |||
if err != nil { | |||
s.logger.Error("message %v has invalid body: %s", msg.MessageId, err.Error()) | |||
// TODO: publish error to DLQ. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 OpenAI
The patch modifies the code in the ProcessMessage
function of pkg/pubsub/sqs_sub.go
file. It replaces a call to proto.UnmarshalText
with p.UnmarshalFromText
.
Ensure that the replacement method UnmarshalFromText
behaves equivalently to proto.UnmarshalText
and handles the message body correctly. Verify that this change does not introduce any new bugs or unexpected behavior.
Consider reviewing the implementation of UnmarshalFromText
to confirm its correctness and compatibility with the existing code logic.
Please verify that the replacement method 'UnmarshalFromText' behaves equivalently to 'proto.UnmarshalText' and handles the message body correctly without introducing new bugs.
Please proceed with the next patch for review.
🤖 OpenAI Reviewing existing code in: docker/grpc_health.go The existing code in the
Overall, the code seems functional but could benefit from some security and error-handling enhancements. If you would like me to provide specific suggestions or modifications, please let me know. |
"github.com/google/uuid" | ||
"github.com/massenz/slf4go/logging" | ||
|
||
protos "github.com/massenz/statemachine-proto/golang/api" | ||
) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 OpenAI
The patch removes the import of github.com/golang/protobuf/proto
from the file. This change seems fine as long as there are no references to proto
from this package in the rest of the file. It's important to ensure that the removal of this import does not break any functionality related to protobuf handling.
I recommend verifying that there are no dependencies on proto
from github.com/golang/protobuf/proto
before finalizing this change.
Please verify that there are no dependencies on `proto` from `github.com/golang/protobuf/proto` in the file after removing the import.
Please proceed with the next patch for review.
@@ -63,7 +61,8 @@ var _ = Describe("SQS Publisher", func() { | |||
// Emulate SQS Client behavior | |||
body := *res.Body | |||
var receivedEvt protos.EventResponse | |||
Expect(proto.UnmarshalText(body, &receivedEvt)).Should(Succeed()) | |||
unmarshaler := pubsub.Base64ProtoMarshaler{} | |||
Expect(unmarshaler.UnmarshalFromText(body, &receivedEvt)).Should(Succeed()) | |||
Expect(receivedEvt).To(Respect(notification)) | |||
|
|||
close(notificationsCh) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 OpenAI
The patch replaces the usage of proto.UnmarshalText
with a custom Base64ProtoMarshaler
for unmarshaling in the test file. This change introduces a new custom unmarshaler, which could be beneficial for handling specific cases or improving code readability.
Ensure that the Base64ProtoMarshaler
implementation is correct and handles the unmarshaling process appropriately. It's important to verify that this change does not introduce any regressions in the unmarshaling logic.
Please verify the correctness of the `Base64ProtoMarshaler` implementation and ensure that the unmarshaling process works as expected.
This patch looks acceptable with the provided context. Please proceed with the next patch for review.
g.Expect(proto.UnmarshalText(*res.Body, &receivedEvt)).Should(Succeed()) | ||
unmarshaler := pubsub.Base64ProtoMarshaler{} | ||
g.Expect(unmarshaler.UnmarshalFromText(*res.Body, | ||
&receivedEvt)).Should(Succeed()) | ||
g.Expect(receivedEvt.EventId).To(Equal(fmt.Sprintf("event-%d", i))) | ||
g.Expect(receivedEvt.Outcome.Code).To(Equal(protos.EventOutcome_InternalError)) | ||
g.Expect(receivedEvt.Outcome.Details).To(Equal("more details about the error")) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 OpenAI
The patch introduces the usage of Base64ProtoMarshaler
for unmarshaling in another part of the test file. This change seems consistent with the previous modification and maintains the custom unmarshaler approach.
As before, ensure that the Base64ProtoMarshaler
implementation is correct and handles the unmarshaling process appropriately. Verify that this change does not introduce any issues related to unmarshaling or data consistency.
Please confirm that the `Base64ProtoMarshaler` is correctly implemented and continues to handle the unmarshaling process without issues.
This patch aligns with the previous changes and appears acceptable based on the provided context. Please proceed with the next patch for review.
Apparently moving to 1.44 to 1.51 for the AWS SDK causes a decoding error of some sorts.
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
🤖 OpenAI Reviewing existing code in: Makefile The existing code in the
Overall, the existing code seems to be in good shape. Feel free to ask if you need further assistance or have specific areas you would like me to review. |
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ import ( | |||
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/aws" | |||
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/aws/session" | |||
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/service/sqs" | |||
"github.com/golang/protobuf/proto" | |||
"github.com/massenz/go-statemachine/pkg/api" | |||
log "github.com/massenz/slf4go/logging" | |||
"os" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 OpenAI
The patch removes the import of "github.com/golang/protobuf/proto"
from the pkg/pubsub/sqs_sub.go
file.
This change suggests that the protobuf functionality previously used from this package is no longer needed or has been replaced by another method. It's important to ensure that this removal does not break any existing functionality that relied on the protobuf package.
Consider verifying if any code in the file depends on the removed package and update it accordingly. If the protobuf functionality is still required, ensure that it is imported from the correct package.
Please verify if any code in the file relies on the removed 'github.com/golang/protobuf/proto' package. Update the code accordingly if protobuf functionality is still needed.
Please proceed with the next patch for review.
Summary by OpenAI
Release Notes: