-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 258
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for MSC4717: service members 🫡 #4335
Conversation
3c1875d
to
0ecbbc2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good on principle, thanks! Should we move the dependent PR forward first? (If so: feel free to steal the review on it, I have lost context, and I'm not sure if it's ready for review or if it's expecting more work)
0ecbbc2
to
e7bc8f6
Compare
a486941
to
0815468
Compare
(Removed review request until the dependent PR is merged first.) |
Why? |
Because OP reads:
|
Ok but you reviewed the PR event though OP read that same message. Then I addressed all of your review comments except one. Now you're telling me that you won't review it because OP reads this message. I'm asking why you changed your mind and why do you think that #4228 needs to be merged before this one is reviewed? They are conceptually unrelated, they are tied together because Ruma had breaking changes. On the topic of #4228, seems that the author also addressed your concerns but is as well waiting on your review. |
If the code i need to review is meant to change, and that change is expected in an obvious way (in this case, because we'll update the ref to Ruma's source), then I prefer to wait on the final version of the code before doing the review. In any case, feel free to steal the review of the dependent PR; I am not bound to it in any ways, and I would appreciate the support in sharing the review load 🙏 |
e7bc8f6
to
fbd158e
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4335 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.15% 85.17% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 280 280
Lines 30861 30879 +18
==========================================
+ Hits 26281 26301 +20
+ Misses 4580 4578 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
fbd158e
to
3f01945
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Only reviewed the second commit, assuming we'll wait for the dependent PR to be first reviewed and merged before landing this.
Introduce support for MSC4171, enabling the designation of certain users as service members. These flagged users are excluded from the room display name calculation. MSC: matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#4171
68c8b97
to
97439b3
Compare
Depends on #4228, only the second commit here is relevant.
This adds support for service members to be excluded from the room display name calculation logic as described in MSC4717.