Update repository instructions #2155
Conversation
Deploying with
|
| Latest commit: |
47cbe60
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://7364e038.matrix-website.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://update-instructions.matrix-website.pages.dev |
| - `Alpha` if your software is still experimental | ||
| - `Obsolete` if your software is no longer maintaines | ||
| - `featured` should be left to false. We are working on [processes to formalise which project should be featured or not](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix.org/issues/1584). | ||
| - For the `licence`, please use [one of the identifiers listed by the SPDX](https://spdx.org/licenses/) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What about licenses that are not on that list? Every once in a while I encounter those. Draupnir had that too for quite a while. Should just the name be used?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm that's a very good question. How often did you encounter those?
I mostly want to enforce the SPDX identifier rules to have clean data and keep the door open to 🌈 hypothetical future automation 🌈 but that might be a case of premature optimisation.
I guess we could allow the license name in full text if it doesn't have a SPDX identifier?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I encountered so far only the draupnir one but I was wondering about the national stuff like eu or german ones. Though I have to check if they maybe have ids on that list. Will check later or tomorrow
MTRNord
added
enhancement
|
We have an interesting case with #2194: Syncloud is selling devices that allow people to host their own services. We need to make it obvious that hosting providers need to do the hosting themselves. Syncloud seems to be more akin to a Distribution (as #2182 supports) |
Closes #2148
TODO: