-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FF Project issues template #32828
FF Project issues template #32828
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also leaving a +1, ty
Yeh +1 from me aswell - thanks @hamishwillee |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we remove @mdn/core-dev
from the CODEOWNERS for this template at the same time, since this template is owned by the MDN content team?
@caugner Good idea, but since I have never touched the CODEOWNERS file before, can you please confirm that I have done this "as you wish" before I merge? |
@hamishwillee I think the change needed to be made to the following line in the "CONTROL FILES OWNER(S)" section:
@caugner can confirm. |
.github/CODEOWNERS
Outdated
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
# GITHUB WORKFLOW OWNER(S) | ||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
/.github/ @mdn/yari-content-mdn |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be specific to the templates:
/.github/ @mdn/yari-content-mdn | |
/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ff-project-issue.md @mdn/core-yari-content |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was almost thinking of only change the code owner for ff-project-issue.md, because the other two issue templates are referenced in yari, so the devs might want to know and approve changes. Wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would this on line 77 take precedence?
/.github/ @mdn/core-dev
- If yes, should we be changing that line instead of adding this new section?
- Also consider:
core-yari-content
oryari-content-mdn
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would this on line 77 take precedence?
Yes it does, later rules override previous ones, so this issue template addition has to appear after
.github/CODEOWNERS
Outdated
@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ | |||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/files/en-us/ @mdn/yari-content-mdn | |||
|
|||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
# GITHUB WORKFLOW OWNER(S) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
# GITHUB WORKFLOW OWNER(S) | |
# ISSUE TEMPLATES |
Thanks, I wasn't sure if the comment was that MDN own the templates or the whole github workflow. @caugner Can you confirm your intent? |
4c22e78
to
c3a83f2
Compare
Thanks, all. Going to merge now! |
This updates the FF project issues template in line with current way of working. FYI @bsmth @Rumyra @dipikabh @pepelsbey @dletorey