-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add nos17:creator-pack-02
#52
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The files installed correctly via command line. Tested in game. |
Please take a look at the |
🤦♂️ |
- assetId: "dk1-bowling-lanes" | ||
include: | ||
- "\\.SC4Model$" | ||
- assetId: "dk1-burger-chef" | ||
include: | ||
- "\\.SC4Model$" | ||
- assetId: "dk1-convenience-stores-1" | ||
include: | ||
- "\\.SC4Model$" | ||
- assetId: "dk1-convenience-stores-2" | ||
include: | ||
- "\\.SC4Model$" | ||
- assetId: "dk1-donut-shops" | ||
include: | ||
- "\\.SC4Model$" | ||
- assetId: "dk1-king-and-queen" | ||
include: | ||
- "\\.SC4Model$" | ||
- assetId: "dk1-retro-kroger" | ||
include: | ||
- "\\.SC4Model$" | ||
- assetId: "dk1-small-restaurants" | ||
include: | ||
- "\\.SC4Model$" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Including files directly from foreign assets isn't what I'd usually do (see #40).
Would it be acceptable for you to add the dk1 packages as dependencies instead? This would imply that the dk1 lots gets installed, too, when your creator pack package is installed.
The alternative would be to split off the models from the dk1 packages into separate packages, so you only depend on the models without the lots.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Including files directly from foreign assets isn't what I'd usually do (see #40).
Would it be acceptable for you to add the dk1 packages as dependencies instead? This would imply that the dk1 lots gets installed, too, when your creator pack package is installed.
The alternative would be to split off the models from the dk1 packages into separate packages, so you only depend on the models without the lots.
Sure thing. I originally was not excited to make the models separate packages, but it's probably the best route to take now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Which of the two approaches do you prefer? Do you plan to implement it? Otherwise, I'll try to make the changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Which of the two approaches do you prefer? Do you plan to implement it? Otherwise, I'll try to make the changes.
Sorry I wasn't clear. The second options. Not a huge fan of including them as dependencies as that would also install dk1's lots which I do not want to include. I will remake them as model/dependency packages, probably sometime within the next week or so.
No description provided.