Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Create read-only-fs.md #592

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

docs: Create read-only-fs.md #592

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

rarkins
Copy link
Member

@rarkins rarkins commented Oct 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced documentation for support of read-only file systems in version 9.0.0.
  • Documentation
    • Detailed steps for testing read-only file systems, including configuration for Server and Worker images.
    • Provided guidance on volume mapping and potential risks associated with read-only environments.
    • Suggested enhancements for package managers to mitigate write issues in read-only setups.

Copy link
Contributor

@justo-mend justo-mend left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two tweaks to wording

docs/read-only-fs.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/read-only-fs.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Justin Clareburt <[email protected]>
justo-mend
justo-mend previously approved these changes Oct 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@justo-mend justo-mend left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shall we accept the suggestion from the Code Rabbit AI?

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new documentation file named read-only-fs.md has been added to the docs/ directory, detailing the support for read-only file systems introduced in version 9.0.0. The document provides instructions for testing this feature using pre-release Enterprise Edition (EE) images, including a list of official release images for both Community and Enterprise versions. It outlines the configuration requirements for both Server and Worker images to operate in read-only mode, recommending the use of readOnlyRootFilesystem in Kubernetes.

Key points include the necessity of mapping read-write volumes, specifying that the EE Server must have a read-write /tmp volume, while the EE Worker needs read-write access to both /tmp and /opt/containerbase volumes. The documentation also highlights potential risks with read-only file systems, particularly concerning package managers that might attempt to write files in unintended locations. It suggests enhancements to the Renovate CLI for directing package managers to a designated directory for writing. The document concludes with testing and release criteria, emphasizing the correct functioning of package managers in updating lock files while using only the specified read-write volumes.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nabeelsaabna nabeelsaabna marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2024 10:17
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs/read-only-fs.md (3)

1-4: Consider adding context about benefits of read-only filesystems

The introduction could be enhanced by briefly explaining the security and operational benefits of using read-only filesystems (e.g., improved security posture, container immutability, compliance requirements).

 # Read-only File Systems

 Support for read-only file systems is available from version 9.0.0
+
+Read-only filesystems provide enhanced security by preventing runtime modifications to the container's filesystem, ensuring container immutability, and helping meet security compliance requirements.

15-21: Consider adding Kubernetes configuration examples

While the instructions mention Kubernetes, providing a concrete example would make implementation easier for users.

 Set both the Server and Worker images to run with read-only file systems (e.g. `readOnlyRootFilesystem` in Kubernetes).

+Example Kubernetes configuration:
+```yaml
+securityContext:
+  readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
+volumeMounts:
+  - name: tmp
+    mountPath: /tmp
+volumes:
+  - name: tmp
+    emptyDir: {}
+```

30-32: Consider adding specific testing steps and validation criteria

The success criteria could be more detailed to help users verify their setup is working correctly.

 ## Testing and release

 The measure of success is that all packager managers succeed (e.g. at updating lock files) using the read-write volumes only.
+
+Recommended validation steps:
+1. Configure a test repository with various package managers (npm, pip, golang, etc.)
+2. Run Renovate with read-only filesystem enabled
+3. Verify that dependency updates complete successfully
+4. Check logs for any filesystem-related errors
+5. Confirm that no writes occur outside the designated read-write volumes
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f59307e and 119d468.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/read-only-fs.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/read-only-fs.md (1)

Pattern **/*: - Feedback will only be given on issues that could cause bugs or involve very bad practices.

  • Comments will be kept concise and focused on critical areas.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/read-only-fs.md (1)

25-28: Risk description and mitigation strategy is well explained

The explanation of risks and mitigation strategies is clear and helpful. The suggestion to use environment variables for directing package managers to write to /tmp/renovate is a good practice.

docs/read-only-fs.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@justo-mend
Copy link
Contributor

justo-mend commented Dec 4, 2024

Let's update the pre-release section.

docs/read-only-fs.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
docs/read-only-fs.md (4)

7-7: Minor: Remove trailing punctuation from heading

To comply with markdown style guidelines, remove the colon from the heading.

-## Use the official release images:
+## Use the official release images
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)

7-7: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)


13-13: Consider adding a Kubernetes example

The reference to readOnlyRootFilesystem in Kubernetes would be clearer with a practical example.

Consider adding a snippet like:

securityContext:
  readOnlyRootFilesystem: true

25-26: Consider adding specific environment variable examples

The mention of environment variables would be more helpful with concrete examples of how to configure package managers to write to /tmp/renovate.


28-30: Consider adding specific testing steps

The testing criteria could be enhanced with:

  1. Step-by-step verification process
  2. Common failure scenarios to watch for
  3. Troubleshooting guidelines

Would you like me to help draft these additional sections?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 119d468 and d0ea926.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/read-only-fs.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/read-only-fs.md (1)

Pattern **/*: - Feedback will only be given on issues that could cause bugs or involve very bad practices.

  • Comments will be kept concise and focused on critical areas.
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
docs/read-only-fs.md

7-7: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/read-only-fs.md (1)

1-4: LGTM!

Clear and concise introduction with specific version information.

@justo-mend justo-mend added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit dc0fcee Dec 4, 2024
2 checks passed
@justo-mend justo-mend deleted the docs/read-only-fs branch December 4, 2024 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants