[chore][scehams] - make it a go pkg

[VihasMakwana]

This will be consumed by meshery/server once released

Notes for Reviewers

This PR fixes #

Signed commits

• Yes, I signed my commits.

[welcome]

Yay, your first pull request! 👍 A contributor will be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, you can find updates in the #github-notifications channel in the community Slack.
Be sure to double-check that you have signed your commits. Here are instructions for making signing an implicit activity while performing a commit.

[VihasMakwana]

@leecalcote @theBeginner86 is this what you guys are expecting? Let me know.

[leecalcote]

Can we make this meshery/schemas?

[MUzairS15]

Will you also open a PR in meshkit to remove the copy of this code?
https://github.com/meshery/meshkit/blob/0878150d8145d0cace27e600c44dc66adda961b0/schemas/schemaProvider.go#L32

[Yashsharma1911]

@VihasMakwana sounds good, however you might not need to import these schemas we already have them here inside /schemas directory here is one of example https://github.com/meshery/schemas/blob/master/schemas/external/ui/catalog/applicationImport.json

A proper structure to store schemas is needed, you might like to check schemas directory in the root directory, the folder structure of schemas in Meshkit isn't good

[MUzairS15]

Just to remind, this repository is meant to store schemas and their equivalent Golang structs, not any core logic around it. Hence I prefer to keep the logic to refer these RJSF schemas (required by UI) in meshkit, i.e. update the function to refer the schemas defined in this schemas repo using a git walker.

As an init function in a go routine, the RJSF schemas will be imported from this repo (can be lazy loaded as well), and can be served by the Meshery server.

[VihasMakwana]

Will you also open a PR in meshkit to remove the copy of this code? https://github.com/meshery/meshkit/blob/0878150d8145d0cace27e600c44dc66adda961b0/schemas/schemaProvider.go#L32

Yup

[leecalcote]

There has been another commit or two made. Ready for a second review?

[VihasMakwana]

@leecalcote @MUzairS15 yeah, PTAL. Thanks

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[MUzairS15]

Thank you for volunteering @VihasMakwana , we have decided to move forward with otherapproach. The RJSF schemas that were being added as a package will now be served form the sistent NPM package.

[leecalcote]

Given this I'll propose that we close this PR. At the same time, I'll say: @VihasMakwana, thanks for this PR! Come back. We miss you. 😉