CRQ-055: Enhance CRQ Parser for CoderabbitAI Skipped Reviews

[jmikedupont2]

User description

This PR enhances the CRQ parser for CoderabbitAI skipped reviews as part of CRQ-055.

---

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Add CRQ parser CLI tool for processing markdown files

• Implement CRQ state recognizer for CoderabbitAI skipped reviews

• Create comprehensive test suite for state recognition

• Add detailed CRQ documentation with implementation progress

---

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  CLI["CRQ Parser CLI"] --> Parser["CRQ Parser"]
  Parser --> Recognizer["State Recognizer"]
  Recognizer --> Tests["Test Suite"]
  CLI --> Docs["CRQ Documentation"]

Loading

File Walkthrough

	Relevant files
Enhancement	crq-parser-cli.rs Add CRQ parser command-line interface                                        src/bin/crq-parser-cli.rs Create CLI tool using clap for parsing CRQ markdown files Extract CRQ ID from filename and display parsed content Handle file reading errors with proper error messages +44/-0    crq_parser.rs Implement CRQ markdown parser module                                          src/crq_parser.rs Implement CRQ struct with all required fields Add markdown parsing logic using regex for sections Extract title and sections from CRQ markdown format Support optional fields like dependencies and progress +97/-0    crq_state_recognizer.rs Add CoderabbitAI skipped review detection                                src/crq_state_recognizer.rs Create function to detect CoderabbitAI skipped reviews Check for size limit keywords in response content Support multiple skip indicators like "max files limit" +15/-0
Tests	test_crq_state_recognizer.rs Create test suite for state recognizer                                      tests/test_crq_state_recognizer.rs Add comprehensive test cases for state recognition Test positive cases with various skip messages Test negative cases to avoid false positives Cover edge cases like rate limits and normal reviews +85/-0
Documentation	CRQ-055-enhance-crq-parser-for-coderabbitai-skipped-reviews.md Add detailed CRQ documentation and progress                            docs/crq_standardized/CRQ-055-enhance-crq-parser-for-coderabbitai-skipped-reviews.md Document CRQ enhancement requirements and solution Detail implementation progress and status updates Include related work on Wikipedia extraction components Provide comprehensive project context and next steps +94/-0

---

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/CRQ-055-enhance-crq-parser

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Incorrect ID Parsing The CRQ ID extraction logic likely returns the whole remainder after the first dash (e.g., "CRQ-003-...") instead of "CRQ-003". Consider splitting on all dashes and taking the first two segments or using a regex to capture the ID. let crq_id = file_name.splitn(2, '-').take(2).collect::<Vec<&str>>().join("-"); Move Error Accessing optional fields with if-let moves them out of the struct, causing a partial move and preventing subsequent field access. Borrow the options (e.g., as_ref or ref pattern) to avoid moving. if let Some(deps) = crq.dependencies { println!("Dependencies: {}", deps); } if let Some(progress) = crq.partial_progress_learnings { println!("Partial Progress/Learnings: {}", progress); } Fragile Title Extraction The title regex is strict and may not match real CRQ docs (e.g., "CRQ: ..." in bold). Also, error messages have leading spaces. Consider more flexible patterns and cleaner error messages. let title_re = Regex::new(r"## Change Request: ([^\n]+)").unwrap(); let title = title_re.captures(crq_content) .map(|caps| caps[1].trim().to_string()) .ok_or_else(|| " Title not found".to_string())?;

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
High-level	Fix module structure/imports The suggestion points out that new modules crq_parser and crq_state_recognizer are not correctly integrated into the project's module structure. This results in invalid import paths like submodules::crq_parser in the CLI and test files, which will cause a build failure. It recommends fixing the module hierarchy to make the new code accessible. Examples: src/bin/crq-parser-cli.rs [4] use submodules::crq_parser::CRQ; tests/test_crq_state_recognizer.rs [1] use submodules::crq_state_recognizer::is_review_skipped_due_to_size_limit; Solution Walkthrough: Before: // src/bin/crq-parser-cli.rs use submodules::crq_parser::CRQ; ... // tests/test_crq_state_recognizer.rs use submodules::crq_state_recognizer::is_review_skipped_due_to_size_limit; ... // src/crq_parser.rs and src/crq_state_recognizer.rs are added // but not declared in a module tree (e.g., in src/lib.rs). // This will cause a compilation error. After: // src/lib.rs (or equivalent module root) pub mod crq_parser; pub mod crq_state_recognizer; // src/bin/crq-parser-cli.rs // Assuming 'your_crate_name' is the library crate name use your_crate_name::crq_parser::CRQ; ... // tests/test_crq_state_recognizer.rs use your_crate_name::crq_state_recognizer::is_review_skipped_due_to_size_limit; ... Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 __ Why: This suggestion correctly identifies a critical build-breaking issue where new modules are not properly declared, causing import paths to be invalid.	High
Possible issue	Correct CRQ ID extraction The CRQ ID extraction is incorrect: using splitn(2, '-') keeps the entire remainder after the first dash, yielding IDs like CRQ-055-suffix. Split on all dashes and take the first two segments to reliably get CRQ-055. This prevents downstream misclassification and parsing errors. src/bin/crq-parser-cli.rs [26] -let crq_id = file_name.splitn(2, '-').take(2).collect::<Vec<&str>>().join("-"); +let crq_id = file_name.split('-').take(2).collect::<Vec<&str>>().join("-"); Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a bug where splitn is used instead of split, causing incorrect extraction of the crq_id. This is a critical fix, as the wrong ID would cause downstream logic to fail.	High
More