meta-introspector · jmikedupont2 · Sep 12, 2025 · Sep 13, 2025
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
@@ -6,4 +6,6 @@ target/
 result
 result/
 submodule_collector_strace.log
-*~
+*~
+.emacs.d/
+
diff --git a/analysis_data/comms/git/CRQ-37/coderabbitai/responses/001.md b/analysis_data/comms/git/CRQ-37/coderabbitai/responses/001.md
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+---
+crq: "CRQ-37"
+messageId: "001"
+timestamp: "2025-09-11T19:02:31Z"
+author: "coderabbitai"
+---
+
+<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
+<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: rate limited by coderabbit.ai -->
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> ## Rate limit exceeded
+> 
+> @jmikedupont2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait **29 minutes and 47 seconds** before requesting another review.
+> 
+> <details>
+> <summary>⌛ How to resolve this issue?</summary>
+> 
+> After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
+> 
+> We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
+> 
+> </details>
+> 
+> 
+> <details>
+> <summary>🚦 How do rate limits work?</summary>
+> 
+> CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
+> 
+> Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
+> 
+> Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.
+> 
+> </details>
+> 
+> <details>
+> <summary>📥 Commits</summary>
+> 
+> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 259f61c12260f34550a17f8441450fa3e1d91596 and e46cbc4378b8f083f8c5287720e6ef923d8ce82c.
+> 
+> </details>
+> 
+> <details>
+> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary>
+> 
+> * `task.md` (1 hunks)
+> 
+> </details>
+
+<!-- end of auto-generated comment: rate limited by coderabbit.ai -->
+<!-- finishing_touch_checkbox_start -->
+
+<details>
+<summary>✨ Finishing touches</summary>
+
+<details>
+<summary>🧪 Generate unit tests</summary>
+
+- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "f47ac10b-58cc-4372-a567-0e02b2c3d479", "radioGroupId": "utg-output-choice-group-3283020912"} -->   Create PR with unit tests
+- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "07f1e7d6-8a8e-4e23-9900-8731c2c87f58", "radioGroupId": "utg-output-choice-group-3283020912"} -->   Post copyable unit tests in a comment
+- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "6ba7b810-9dad-11d1-80b4-00c04fd430c8", "radioGroupId": "utg-output-choice-group-3283020912"} -->   Commit unit tests in branch `feature/crq-37-crq-006-process-unification-kether-review`
+
+</details>
+
+</details>
+
+<!-- finishing_touch_checkbox_end -->
+<!-- tips_start -->
+
+---
+
+Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
+
+<details>
+<summary>❤️ Share</summary>
+
+- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)
+- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)
+- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)
+- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
+
+</details>
+
+<sub>Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.</sub>
+
+<!-- tips_end -->
diff --git a/analysis_data/comms/git/CRQ-37/coderabbitai/responses/001_coderabbitai.md b/analysis_data/comms/git/CRQ-37/coderabbitai/responses/001_coderabbitai.md
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+---
+crq: "CRQ-37"
+messageId: "001"
+timestamp: "2025-09-11T19:02:31Z"
+author: "coderabbitai"
+---
+
+<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
+<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: rate limited by coderabbit.ai -->
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> ## Rate limit exceeded
+> 
+> @jmikedupont2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait **29 minutes and 47 seconds** before requesting another review.
+> 
+> <details>
+> <summary>⌛ How to resolve this issue?</summary>
+> 
+> After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.
+> 
+> We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
+> 
+> </details>
+> 
+> 
+> <details>
+> <summary>🚦 How do rate limits work?</summary>
+> 
+> CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
+> 
+> Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
+> 
+> Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.
+> 
+> </details>
+> 
+> <details>
+> <summary>📥 Commits</summary>
+> 
+> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 259f61c12260f34550a17f8441450fa3e1d91596 and e46cbc4378b8f083f8c5287720e6ef923d8ce82c.
+> 
+> </details>
+> 
+> <details>
+> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary>
+> 
+> * `task.md` (1 hunks)
+> 
+> </details>
+
+<!-- end of auto-generated comment: rate limited by coderabbit.ai -->
+<!-- finishing_touch_checkbox_start -->
+
+<details>
+<summary>✨ Finishing touches</summary>
+
+<details>
+<summary>🧪 Generate unit tests</summary>
+
+- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "f47ac10b-58cc-4372-a567-0e02b2c3d479", "radioGroupId": "utg-output-choice-group-3283020912"} -->   Create PR with unit tests
+- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "07f1e7d6-8a8e-4e23-9900-8731c2c87f58", "radioGroupId": "utg-output-choice-group-3283020912"} -->   Post copyable unit tests in a comment
+- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "6ba7b810-9dad-11d1-80b4-00c04fd430c8", "radioGroupId": "utg-output-choice-group-3283020912"} -->   Commit unit tests in branch `feature/crq-37-crq-006-process-unification-kether-review`
+
+</details>
+
+</details>
+
+<!-- finishing_touch_checkbox_end -->
+<!-- tips_start -->
+
+---
+
+Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
+
+<details>
+<summary>❤️ Share</summary>
+
+- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)
+- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)
+- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)
+- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
+
+</details>
+
+<sub>Comment `@coderabbitai help` to get the list of available commands and usage tips.</sub>
+
+<!-- tips_end -->
diff --git a/analysis_data/comms/git/CRQ-37/coderabbitai/responses/002.md b/analysis_data/comms/git/CRQ-37/coderabbitai/responses/002.md
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+crq: "CRQ-37"
+messageId: "002"
+timestamp: "2025-09-11T19:05:53Z"
+author: "qodo-merge-pro"
+---
+
+## PR Reviewer Guide 🔍
+
+Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
+
+<table>
+<tr><td>⏱️&nbsp;<strong>Estimated effort to review</strong>: 5 🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵</td></tr>
+<tr><td>🧪&nbsp;<strong>PR contains tests</strong></td></tr>
+<tr><td>🔒&nbsp;<strong>No security concerns identified</strong></td></tr>
+<tr><td>⚡&nbsp;<strong>Recommended focus areas for review</strong><br><br>
+
+<details><summary><a href='https://github.com/meta-introspector/git-submodules-rs-nix/pull/20/files#diff-d4b10dc90da2ebd2e54c216c08faf398915f797cc4bf2e94185cd40832762c62R208-R209'><strong>Compile Error</strong></a>
+
+The `main` function returns `Ok(())` but is declared to return `()`. Change the signature to return `Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>>` or remove the `Ok(())` to avoid a type mismatch at compile time.
+</summary>
+
+```rust
+    Ok(())
+}
+
+```
+
+</details>
+
+<details><summary><a href='https://github.com/meta-introspector/git-submodules-rs-nix/pull/20/files#diff-d4b10dc90da2ebd2e54c216c08faf398915f797cc4bf2e94185cd40832762c62R182-R187'><strong>Possible Panic</strong></a>
+
+The similarity loop indexes `bin_predicates[i]` using the length of `code_predicates`, which can be larger than the bin predicate vector, risking an out-of-bounds panic. Use the minimum length or iterate zipped slices when comparing predicates.
+</summary>
+
+```rust
+    if code_predicates[i].0 && bin_predicates[i].0 {
+        shared_count += 1;
+    }
+}
+
+if shared_count > max_shared_predicates {
+
+```
+
+</details>
+
+<details><summary><a href='https://github.com/meta-introspector/git-submodules-rs-nix/pull/20/files#diff-243854d89636db85a935fa955ee16fa44ea3ca7092902bc29701c3a825b0ba0aR119-R124'><strong>API Misuse</strong></a>
+
+`HasValueCount::value_count` is defined as an associated function but is called as a method on an instance (`instance.units[0].value_count()`), which will not compile. Use `T::value_count()` or refactor the trait to have an instance method.
+</summary>
+
+```rust
+
+pub fn add_instance(&mut self, instance: Instance<T>) {
+    assert_eq!(instance.units[0].value_count(), self.value_type.count(),
+               "Instance unit value count must match layer's value type");
+    self.instances.push(instance);
+}
+
+```
+
+</details>
+
+</td></tr>
+</table>
diff --git a/analysis_data/comms/git/CRQ-37/coderabbitai/responses/002_coderabbitai.md b/analysis_data/comms/git/CRQ-37/coderabbitai/responses/002_coderabbitai.md
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+crq: "CRQ-37"
+messageId: "002"
+timestamp: "2025-09-12T00:01:26Z"
+author: "coderabbitai"
+---
+
+<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
+<details>
+<summary>✅ Actions performed</summary>
+
+Review triggered.
+
+> Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.
+
+</details>
-Original file line number
+Diff line change
@@ Expand Up / @@ -6,4 +6,6 @@ target/ @@
     result
     result/
     submodule_collector_strace.log
-    *~
+    *~
+    .emacs.d/