Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Diva deployment quick fix #351

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

Dimo99
Copy link
Collaborator

@Dimo99 Dimo99 commented Jun 12, 2024

No description provided.

@Dimo99 Dimo99 requested review from Xearty and Owliie June 12, 2024 14:51
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Imo publishers should not be in input_fetchers

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, but I didn't want to define another package.json just for the publishers. Also it doesn't make sense to be in solidity folder as it does not rely on hardhat and it also uses a lot of the structures from the redis defined in the input_fetchers thing

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this needs to be a separate workspace

Comment on lines +3 to +19
const depositItems = [
{
pubkey:
'0xaaf6c1251e73fb600624937760fef218aace5b253bf068ed45398aeb29d821e4d2899343ddcbbe37cb3f6cf500dff26c',
withdrawalCredentials:
'0x0048281f02e108ec495e48a25d2adb4732df75bf5750c060ff31c864c053d28d',
signature:
'0xa89660de6049478c8459383235b8ffaf8be15fd16fc93ea65db6e51e80eaba9c291a9a1bda98d08740a89b3226e89b9804c0f1760e4483d26d33b465fc13565e77a8430900ca245a2b628546abfa6172c758ab81d23bd360bb233a2771242f8f',
depositDataRoot:
'0xfce4b23c858a57df1af11aa3fec24b4d50e8048366aa88fbf2bf8b6c6f877b71',
},
{
pubkey:
'0x8aa5bbee21e98c7b9e7a4c8ea45aa99f89e22992fa4fc2d73869d77da4cc8a05b25b61931ff521986677dd7f7159e8e6',
withdrawalCredentials:
'0x0034432b9814c1972e63d60d763584ceea8542de8d397120136e60d731b2de31',
signature:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stick these in a json and import it

@Dimo99 Dimo99 requested a review from Xearty June 18, 2024 10:37
@Dimo99 Dimo99 force-pushed the diva_deployment_quick_fix branch from d0ca94f to de7a0f9 Compare June 18, 2024 10:55
@Dimo99 Dimo99 changed the base branch from main to set_verifier_digest June 18, 2024 10:56
redisPort: options['redis-port'],
address: options['address'],
rpcUrl: options['json-rpc'],
protocol: options['protocol'],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The protocol is diva, why is this configurable?

@PetarKirov PetarKirov force-pushed the set_verifier_digest branch 3 times, most recently from 6538d38 to 8a671b8 Compare August 28, 2024 16:15
@PetarKirov
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this PR, since diva_deployment_quick_fix is already part of it's already part of diva-deployment.

@PetarKirov PetarKirov closed this Sep 26, 2024
@PetarKirov PetarKirov deleted the diva_deployment_quick_fix branch September 26, 2024 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants