Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a test plan document #14

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2023
Merged

Add a test plan document #14

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2023

Conversation

fedepaol
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we add something about configuration breaking the node, blocking accepting pod/svc cidrs?

- One configuration for the router prefixes, and the other for advertising the prefixes (some)
- One configuration where we override the announcement list with all
- One configuration where we override the receiving list with all

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we have conflicting config scenarios to handle here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At the moment, the only conflict that might happen is for the base entities, such as having different routers asns for the same VRF or different neighbors with the same IP and different asn.


- Editing the configuration works
- Deleting a given configuration works

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

metrics?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

something about the status?

@fedepaol
Copy link
Member Author

fedepaol commented Jul 5, 2023

I added a premise about this not being comprehensive and the expectation that each new feature will cover with tests.
Added also clarifications about status and metrics.

Signed-off-by: Federico Paolinelli <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@oribon oribon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@fedepaol fedepaol added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 24, 2023
Merged via the queue into metallb:main with commit 68c435d Jul 24, 2023
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants