Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TABLES_NOT_LINKED_TO_OTHERS] Decide how to handle partitioned tables #539

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

mfvanek
Copy link
Owner

@mfvanek mfvanek commented Dec 10, 2024

Closes #528

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (5aa2eea) to head (0de127c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              master      #539   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity      1056      1056           
===========================================
  Files            171       171           
  Lines           2217      2217           
  Branches         152       152           
===========================================
  Hits            2217      2217           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mfvanek mfvanek marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2024 19:07
@mfvanek mfvanek merged commit 0440030 into master Dec 10, 2024
9 checks passed
@mfvanek mfvanek deleted the feature/support-for-partitioned-tables-2 branch December 10, 2024 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[TABLES_NOT_LINKED_TO_OTHERS] Decide how to handle partitioned tables
1 participant