Create 2023-12-6-minutes.md

_posts/2023-12-6-minutes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+---
+title: Minutes 2023-12-6
+layout: post
+author: Edward Miller
+---
+
+# Minutes - Programming and Hacking Communities Meeting
+
+## 12/6/2023, 11:45am
+
+Meeting Chair:
+: Joshua Rollins (JR),
+
+Meeting Secretary:
+: Edward Miller (EM)
+
+Present: 
+: Mikael Vejdemo Johansson (MVJ), Jonathan Hanon (JH), Bilal Abdulrahman (BA), Edward Miller (EM), Sreehari Kalloormana (SK), Joshua Rollins (JR), Rose Wong (RW), Zhiyuan Jin (ZJ), Mark Schramm (MS)
+
+Late:
+:BA arrived at 1:07 pm (Excused -no points lost)
+SK arrived at 12:06 pm (6 in the room at the time of arrival, so 36 penalty points)
+ZJ arrived at 12:07 pm (7 in the room at the time of arrival, so 49 penalty points)
+
+Meeting called to order at 1:17pm by JR.
+
+### Proposal for agenda: 
+
+1. Approving of Agenda 
+2. Collection of priority bids
+3. Review Minutes
+3a. Point Standings
+4. Unfinished business
+5. Reviewing pull requests
+6. Final point standings
+
+### Item 1.  Approving the Agenda 
+
+Agenda moved by JR. Agenda approved as is unanimously.
+
+### Item 2.  Priority Bids
+
+MS proposes to spend 10 points for pull request #80 (PR 80).
+BA proposes to spend 110 points for PR 82.
+MVJ proposes to spend 125 points for PR 75 and 60 points for PR 79.
+JR proposes to spend 10 points for PR 74.
+
+### Item 3.  Approving the Minutes 
+
+JR calls for vote to review minutes until end of class.
+JH, BA, EM, SK, JR, RW, ZJ, and MS vote aye.
+MVJ votes nay. 
+Motion passes by majority vote.
+
+### Item 3a.  Point Standings
+
+MVJ reviews point standings as of last class for the game of Nomic. 
+Minutes from 11-29-23 reviewed briefly only to determine point standings without a motion to approve minutes.
+
+### Item 4.  Unfinished Business 
+
+JR moves to go straight to reviewing pull requests, due to time constraints.
+Motions passes with no objections.
+
+### Item 5.  Reviewing pull requests
+
+#### Pull Request 75
+
+Consideration of PR 75 by MVJ, MVJ spends 125 points per priority bid.
+JR calls the question, vote taken for rule 375. 
+MVJ and EM vote aye, JH, BA, SK, JR, ZJ, and MS vote nay, RW abstains.
+Rule change does not pass.
+MVJ, EM receive 5 points each for dissenting votes in favor of a failed rule change.
+MVJ loses 10 points due to proposing failed rule change.
+
+#### Pull request #82
+
+Consideration of PR 82 by BA, BA spends 110 points per priority bid.
+JH calls the question, seconded. vote taken for rule 382.
+ZJ votes aye, BA, EM, SK, JR, MS, RW, and MVJ vote nay, JH abstains.
+Rule change does not pass.
+BA loses 10 points due to proposing failed rule change.
+ZJ gains 10 points for dissenting on failed rule change.
+
+#### Pull Request 79 
+
+Consideration of PR79 by EM, MVJ spends 60 points per priority bid.
+MS calls for point inversion, seconded, point inversion passes unanimously.
+RW makes motion to amend wording of ‘is passed’ to ‘shall pass’.
+JH makes motion to amend amendment by removing the word ‘and’ from line 10.
+JH calls question, call the question passes unanimously.
+Vote taken on amendments to rule. Rule amendment passes unanimously.
+JR moves to call the question, call the question passes unanimously, vote taken on rule 379.
+JH, BA, EM, SK, JR, RW, MVJ, and MS vote aye, ZJ votes nay.
+Rule 379 passes by majority vote.
+MVJ notes that when points are tallied, the current leader at the time this rule is adopted (1:40pm) will lose half of their points. 
+EM loses 79 points due to rule adoption with point inversion.
+ZJ loses 10 points due to lone dissenting vote during point inversion.
+
+#### Pull request 74
+
+Consideration of PR74 by EM, JR spends 10 points per priority bid.
+BA calls the question, seconded, vote taken to call the question.
+BA votes aye, JH, EM, SK, JR, RW, MVJ, ZJ, and MS vote nay.
+Call the question does not pass, and rule is debated.
+BA calls question, motion to call question passes unanimously, vote taken on rule 374.
+RW, JH, BA, JR, and EM vote aye, MS, SK, and ZJ vote nay, MVJ abstains.
+Rule 374 passes with majority vote.
+EM gains 47 points due to rule adoption, and due to rule adoption clause, 23 of the points must be given to a player of EM’s choosing. EM elects to give points at the end of class.
+MS, SK, and ZJ gain 0 points due to 3 or more dissenting votes.
+
+### POINT TALLYING 
+
+JR makes motion to suspend rules for final point count, seconded.
+Motion to suspend rules for the tallying of points passes unanimously.
+It is noted that BA did not have enough points to spend for priority bid of rule 82.
+Points tallied, and it is determined that ZJ loses 79 points, 
+which is 1/2 of all accumulated points as of the passing of PR79, due to ZJ being the current leader in points with 158 points at the time of rule adoption. 
+The 10 points from point inversion are deducted after half of the points are taken away.
+Motion to adjourn by BA, not seconded. Motion not considered
+EM elects to give his 23 points earned from the passing of rule 74 to JR.
+At 2:00pm all players leave the room without officially adjourning. 
+
+## Total Player Points Gained/Lost on Dec-6-23
+
+- BA -110 -10 = **110 points lost** 
+- MVJ -125 +5 -10 - 60 = **190 points lost** 
+- EM +5 -79   +23 = **51 points lost**
+- SK -36 penalty points for lateness = **36 points lost**
+- JR -10 + 23 = **13 points gained**
+- ZJ -49 penalty points for lateness +10 -79 -10 = **128 points lost**
+
+Note: This does not include point corrections to previous minutes,
+only those gained/lost on above date.