Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Enum types with DataTriggerBehavior #157

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pdecostervgls
Copy link

Implemented support for Enum types with DataTriggerBehavior.
Fixes #84.
Credits go to @P4bl3r (#136) for the implementation, I'm just doing the PR because its an old issue.

@msftclas
Copy link

msftclas commented Apr 23, 2019

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

@pdecostervgls pdecostervgls changed the title Datatrigger enums support for Enum types with DataTriggerBehavior Apr 23, 2019
@pdecostervgls pdecostervgls changed the title support for Enum types with DataTriggerBehavior Support for Enum types with DataTriggerBehavior Apr 23, 2019
@pdecostervgls
Copy link
Author

@skendrot Have you had time to review this again yet?

@pdecostervgls pdecostervgls requested a review from skendrot June 11, 2020 14:41
@pdecostervgls pdecostervgls requested a review from skendrot July 13, 2020 10:58
@pdecostervgls
Copy link
Author

Still not accepted? C'mon guys, its been over a year now for such a small change...
@skendrot

@pdecostervgls
Copy link
Author

@skendrot Half-yearly reminder that this PR is still open.

@bogdan-patraucean
Copy link

Another year later, this is still open.

@bogdan-patraucean
Copy link

@michael-hawker, could you take a look at this? or redirect to someone who actually can merge this? @skendrot seems to not be active anymore.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DataTriggerBehavior doesn't support enum comparison
5 participants