Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the clusterPlots notebook consistent with telemetry schema #68

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

poojanilangekar
Copy link
Contributor

Making the clusterPlots notebook consistent with execTimePlots and storagePlots notebooks.

metrics/notebooks/clusterPlots.ipynb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -50,7 +50,9 @@
"# --- Data manipulations --- #\n",
"\n",
"# Retrieve relevant data from duckdb.\n",
"EXP_DATA = retrieve_experiment_df(con, EXPERIMENT_ID, EXPERIMENT_START_TIME)\n",
"EXP_DATA = pd.DataFrame()\n",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For cluster plots, we only plot one experiment at a time, thus we only have one experiment id (EXPERIMENT_ID = "" instead of EXPERIMENT_ID = [""] like in the other notebooks), so you wouldn't actually need the for-loop here. The reason is that you're plotting different phases as different lines in the plot (vs different experiments as different lines in the plot which is what we do in the latency plots), thus you can actually only plot one experiment at a time. If you have any suggestions on how to visualize multiple experiments in the same plot, let me know! :)

@ashvina
Copy link
Contributor

ashvina commented Jun 15, 2023

Hi @poojanilangekar, thanks for the PR and addressing my review comments.
For context, could you please add a short description of the actual issue you are observing, for e.g. in running the notebook or in extending the notebook for new functionality. It would help in ensuring it is not repeated.
Otherwise LGTM 👍

@jcamachor jcamachor force-pushed the main branch 6 times, most recently from 44a31f1 to 13a6b2c Compare January 23, 2024 01:05
@jcamachor jcamachor force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 868d4f8 to ff310c5 Compare April 30, 2024 18:18
@jcamachor jcamachor force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 4def705 to 7876be3 Compare July 10, 2024 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants