Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 2.0.7 to 2.2.2 #3435

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zzn2
Copy link
Contributor

@zzn2 zzn2 commented Jun 18, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • examples/flows/standard/customer-intent-extraction/requirements.txt

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

…txt to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-7267250
@zzn2 zzn2 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2024 21:26
@github-actions github-actions bot added the examples Improvements on examples label Jun 18, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Hi, thank you for your interest in helping to improve the prompt flow experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue/pull request label Jul 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
examples Improvements on examples no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue/pull request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants