Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Surfacing more image blocks #1371

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Surfacing more image blocks #1371

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

riknoll
Copy link
Member

@riknoll riknoll commented Sep 15, 2022

As has become tradition, I'd like to sneak a few missing blocks into this release.

This PR surfaces some already existent TS image apis into blocks:

image
image

In particular, the width/height block is extremely useful because the only way to get those values right now is to create a sprite (which you then have to immediately destroy).

//% this.defl="picture"
//% from.shadow=screen_image_picker
//% weight=0
drawTransparentImage(from: Image, x: int32, y: int32): void;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need a blockId?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you want to support scale? :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added the blockid! Not opposed to supporting scale, but it might be better off in the scale extension?

Also, fun fact: none of the blocks in the image category other than the ones in this pr have block ids 😅

@abchatra
Copy link
Contributor

What does picture draw do? Add picture inside picture?

@riknoll
Copy link
Member Author

riknoll commented Sep 15, 2022

yeah, it draws one picture on top of another. it's very useful for things like HUDs, where you might want to draw some hearts for lives, etc.

@Jaqster
Copy link
Member

Jaqster commented Sep 15, 2022

Why can't we put these inside an extension? They seem like advanced scenarios to me... Or if you feel like these are important, we could talk about removing some of the existing Image blocks? Do we have telemetry on how popular these blocks are?

@riknoll
Copy link
Member Author

riknoll commented Sep 15, 2022

@Jaqster I'd be okay with removing the circle blocks (i just added those for completeness), but the other three blocks in this pr are all very useful and I think belong in core. I don't think these are any more advanced than the rest of the blocks in the image category.

I think all of these blocks fall into the category of things you would expect any reasonable game making tool to have.

My other motivation is that there isn't a clear extension that these blocks belong in. I want to avoid having a million micro extensions that each contain less than five blocks.

@abchatra
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder if entire Image category should be an extension? (breaking change for sure). Are there any tutorials\skillmaps use this category?

@Jaqster
Copy link
Member

Jaqster commented Sep 16, 2022

How many blocks total would be in the Images category? The most we have in 1 category is 30 (Sprite and Scene) - and I think that's too much. We should talk about maybe setting some limits on # of blocks per category? Makes it really hard to find stuff...

Speaking of, I just did a quick count, and this is what it looks like across our code editors (not counting common blocks):

  • Minecraft - 128 blocks, 8 categories
  • Arcade - 137 blocks, 9 categories
  • Micro:bit - 147 blocks, 10 categories

I think we can do some clean-up in micro:bit (remove some categories from Advanced), and let's really try and focus on only having the most commonly used blocks in the mainline editors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants