Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't quiesce when doing indirect migrations #1387

Merged

Conversation

awels
Copy link
Contributor

@awels awels commented Aug 27, 2024

When doing an indirect migration, we don't want
to quiesce the workloads on rollback. This didn't
happen before, and we should only quiesce when doing a direct volume migration.

When doing an indirect migration, we don't want
to quiesce the workloads on rollback. This didn't
happen before, and we should only quiesce when doing
a direct volume migration.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Wels <[email protected]>
@rayfordj rayfordj merged commit 5a8450b into migtools:master Aug 27, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants