Add min_scan_level to nibbles with phantom result toggle

[originalsouth]

Add min_scan_level to nibbles with phantom result toggle

[underdarknl]

Im curious as to why this phantom result is needed, what does it store, and why?

[noamblitz]

@underdarknl its an interesting idea. Its because we do have to query to know which objects are relevant for the nibble. But after changing the scan level, there is no change in data so saving the phantom results in the first run saves a query when changing the scan level. If the scan level is high enough now, we can just write the phantom results without having to do any querying or calculation.

[noamblitz]

I will add this to the docs including thought process as soon as I’m back.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
3 out of 4 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ originalsouth
✅ dekkers
✅ madelondohmen
❌ weblate
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
50.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
5.1% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud