docs(rdf): included custom_rdf advanced setting
#4641
Conversation
|
| **The value of the `custom_rdf` advanced setting requires valid Turtle-formatted RDF!** | ||
|
|
||
| When this advanced setting is set, it will result in the following: | ||
| * The default namespaces will be ignored (except for the schema-specific namespace which is always present). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
would you not want to override the default namespace?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably depends on how big the default list is. For example, if it includes a lot of namespaces not relevant for that schema you might want to be able to exclude namespaces as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Alternative is building in a check where we exclude unused namespaces (maybe this might be a very easy toggle in RDF4J?). Either way, I think the bigger question is if we want to rely on this at all or move to schema-specific namespaces where the default list only functions as a "fallback".
If it's only a fallback, this approach would suffice I think. If we want to "build upon a hardcoded default list" within each schema instead, then indeed we should change this behaviour.
What are the main changes you did
custom_rdfadvanced settingHow to test
Checklist