Skip to content

CLOUDP-315270: Generate SSDLC report with augmented SBOM on-demand #3916

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 4, 2025

Conversation

cveticm
Copy link
Collaborator

@cveticm cveticm commented May 27, 2025

Proposed changes

Successful run of augment sbom action.

Verifying changes to report script and template do not effect update-ssdlc-report workflow.

Jira ticket: CLOUDP-315270

Checklist

  • I have signed the MongoDB CLA
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added any necessary documentation in document requirements section listed in CONTRIBUTING.md (if appropriate)
  • I have addressed the @mongodb/docs-cloud-team comments (if appropriate)
  • I have updated test/README.md (if an e2e test has been added)
  • I have run make fmt and formatted my code

@cveticm cveticm marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2025 15:11
@cveticm cveticm requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2025 15:11
@cveticm cveticm marked this pull request as draft May 27, 2025 15:12
@cveticm cveticm force-pushed the CLOUDP-315270_generate_augmented_sbom_and_report branch 2 times, most recently from ea89146 to 923ebaa Compare May 28, 2025 15:34
VERSION: ${{ inputs.release_version }}
AUGMENTED_SBOM_TEXT: " - See Augmented SBOM manifests (CycloneDX in JSON format):
\n - This file has been provided along with this report under the name 'linux_amd64_augmented_sbom_v${{ inputs.release_version }}.json'
\n - Please note that this file was generated on ${{ env.date }} and may not reflect the latest security information of all third party dependencies.\n"
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking for reviewers' opinions on this:

I have the date the augmented SBOM is generated in the report as well as including the date in the file names of the report and augmented sbom.

Do you think this is sufficient to flag to the reader that this file can become out-of-date?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so, but I'm OK with keeping this note.

@cveticm cveticm marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2025 15:41
@cveticm cveticm requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2025 15:41
VERSION: ${{ inputs.release_version }}
AUGMENTED_SBOM_TEXT: " - See Augmented SBOM manifests (CycloneDX in JSON format):
\n - This file has been provided along with this report under the name 'linux_amd64_augmented_sbom_v${{ inputs.release_version }}.json'
\n - Please note that this file was generated on ${{ env.date }} and may not reflect the latest security information of all third party dependencies.\n"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so, but I'm OK with keeping this note.

@cveticm cveticm force-pushed the CLOUDP-315270_generate_augmented_sbom_and_report branch from a2a1a60 to 958392e Compare May 29, 2025 12:09
@cveticm cveticm requested a review from blva May 29, 2025 12:13
@cveticm cveticm force-pushed the CLOUDP-315270_generate_augmented_sbom_and_report branch from de5234a to 1030679 Compare June 3, 2025 16:33
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Coverage Report 📈

Branch Commit Coverage
master 1a9cfce 25.1%
CLOUDP-315270_generate_augmented_sbom_and_report 1030679 25.1%
Difference 0%

@cveticm cveticm merged commit c6609e9 into master Jun 4, 2025
22 checks passed
@cveticm cveticm deleted the CLOUDP-315270_generate_augmented_sbom_and_report branch June 4, 2025 09:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants