Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pallet parameters account for all parameters read weight #8

Merged

Conversation

TarekkMA
Copy link

@TarekkMA TarekkMA commented Aug 2, 2024

Account for all parameters read weight on every block, and whitelist the parameters storage so the weight is not double counted.

@TarekkMA TarekkMA changed the title Tarekkma/pallet parameters account weight Pallet parameters account for all raed weight Aug 2, 2024
@TarekkMA TarekkMA changed the title Pallet parameters account for all raed weight Pallet parameters account for all parameters read weight Aug 2, 2024
#[pallet::hooks]
impl<T: Config> Hooks<BlockNumberFor<T>> for Pallet<T> {
fn on_initialize(_: BlockNumberFor<T>) -> Weight {
let items = Parameters::<T>::iter().count() as u64;
Copy link

@RomarQ RomarQ Aug 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the support/procedural/src/dynamic_params.rs in polkadot-sdk, I do not see any storage being set for the initial values (it fallbacks to the defaults when storage is not present). Instead we should get the length from T::RuntimeParameters::default(), because the storage will be empty in the benchmarks.

impl #scrate::__private::Get<#value_types> for #key_names {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not see any insert for the initial values

We don't need to insert initial values in production, only in benchmark setup (for the on_initialize benchmark scenario that still need to be added in this PR)

fn on_initialize(_: BlockNumberFor<T>) -> Weight {
let proof_size_before: u64 = get_proof_size().unwrap_or(0);

let items = Parameters::<T>::iter().count() as u64;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still do not agree with the need for a on_initialize hook here. Also Parameters::<T>::iter() will be empty until set_parameter is called.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not all parameter usage is captured by our benchmarks. For instance, some parameters may be read within xcm or in other unaccounted areas. As a result, we can't rely solely on benchmark coverage to determine parameter impact.
To mitigate potential issues, we should assume that all parameters stored in each block will be read.

This approach helps us avoid hitting the proof size limit and prevents our chain from stalling, which would otherwise require recovery through relay chain governance.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parameters::<T>::iter() initially will be empty, but as we add more and more parameters it will report all the stored ones

@RomarQ
Copy link

RomarQ commented Aug 5, 2024

The only thing missing is the storage whitelist

@TarekkMA TarekkMA merged commit c086b2d into moonbeam-polkadot-v1.11.0 Aug 6, 2024
8 of 16 checks passed
librelois added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
gonzamontiel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2024
gonzamontiel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
gonzamontiel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
gonzamontiel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
TarekkMA pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
TarekkMA pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants