Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return balance and address in MoonChainData #408

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

mmaurello
Copy link
Contributor

Return address, asset balance and fee asset balance of the involved address in Moonchain:

  • For EVM to EVM or EVM to parachain, the user's address.
  • For Parachain to EVM transactions, the computed origin account of the source address

Add balance Builder in moonChain to mrl configs

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 17, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ec3fa08

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

💥 An error occurred when fetching the changed packages and changesets in this PR
Some errors occurred when validating the changesets config:
The package or glob expression "scripts" is specified in the `ignore` option but it is not found in the project. You may have misspelled the package name or provided an invalid glob expression. Note that glob expressions must be defined according to https://www.npmjs.com/package/micromatch.

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Dec 17, 2024

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

@Rihyx Rihyx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good but please write some comments about the logic

@mmaurello mmaurello merged commit 6d608e1 into v3-next Dec 18, 2024
7 checks passed
@mmaurello mmaurello deleted the v3-next-mrl-integration-3 branch December 18, 2024 08:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants