Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

internal: tweak moon upgrade for new toolchain layout #552

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

Young-Flash
Copy link
Collaborator

close #550

Copy link

peter-jerry-ye-code-review bot commented Jan 6, 2025

‼️ This code review is generated by a bot. Please verify the content before trusting it.

Here are three observations and potential issues from the git diff output:

  1. Potential Issue with Path Handling:

    • The code now uses download_item (which includes paths like bin/moon, lib/libtcc1.a, etc.) to construct file paths and directories. However, the code does not explicitly handle cases where download_item might contain invalid or malformed paths. For example, if download_item contains characters that are not allowed in file paths (e.g., :, *, ?, etc.), this could lead to errors when creating directories or files. It might be worth adding validation or sanitization for download_item to ensure it is a valid path.
  2. Inconsistent Path Handling for dst:

    • In the post-handling section, the destination path (dst) is constructed using moon_dir::home().join(download_item). However, earlier in the code, download_item includes subdirectories like bin/, lib/, etc. This could lead to unexpected behavior if moon_dir::home() does not already contain these subdirectories. While the code does create parent directories if they don't exist, it might be better to explicitly ensure that the destination directory structure matches the source structure.
  3. Potential Performance Bottleneck with Arc<Mutex<Term>>:

    • The Arc<Mutex<Term>> is used to synchronize access to the terminal for progress updates. However, locking and unlocking the Mutex for every progress update (e.g., for each chunk of data downloaded) could become a performance bottleneck, especially if there are many concurrent downloads. Consider optimizing this by batching progress updates or using a more efficient synchronization mechanism.

These are the key observations from the diff. Let me know if you'd like further clarification or suggestions for addressing these issues!

@Young-Flash Young-Flash enabled auto-merge January 6, 2025 07:47
@Young-Flash Young-Flash merged commit 18652f2 into main Jan 6, 2025
14 checks passed
@Young-Flash Young-Flash deleted the tweak_moon_upgrade branch January 6, 2025 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant