Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: todo syntax #316

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

feat: todo syntax #316

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

qazxcdswe123
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@qazxcdswe123 qazxcdswe123 requested a review from Yoorkin October 14, 2024 09:05
Copy link

peter-jerry-ye-code-review bot commented Oct 14, 2024

From the provided git diff output, it appears that two files were modified to include a new section titled "Special Syntax" or "特殊语法" (depending on the language), which introduces the TODO syntax using .... Here are some potential issues or suggestions based on the context provided:

  1. Incomplete Function Implementation:

    • The todo_in_func function in both the English and Chinese versions of the documentation returns an Int but contains only ..., which suggests an incomplete implementation. This could mislead readers into thinking that ... is a valid way to define a function's body in MoonBit, which might not be the case.
    • Suggestion: Clarify that ... is a placeholder for future implementation and not valid code that can be executed. Consider providing a note or example of how to properly mark incomplete functions or sections of code in MoonBit, if applicable.
  2. Documentation Consistency:

    • Both the English and Chinese documentation sections introduce the TODO syntax similarly but without much context on its usage or limitations. It's crucial for documentation to be clear and consistent across different languages.
    • Suggestion: Ensure that all documentation sections, especially those introducing new syntax or features, provide comprehensive explanations, usage examples, and any caveats or limitations. This helps maintain consistency and clarity for all users, regardless of their preferred language.
  3. Potential Misinterpretation:

    • The TODO syntax might be confused with a placeholder or a feature that automatically generates code or throws a compile-time error for incomplete implementations. It's important to clarify its intended use, such as marking areas for future work or as placeholders during development.
    • Suggestion: Explicitly state the purpose of the TODO syntax and how it should be used. For example, clarify if it is meant for developer notes, placeholders for future code, or if the compiler treats it in a specific way (e.g., generating a warning or error).

Given the context and the provided diff, these suggestions aim to improve clarity, prevent potential misinterpretations, and ensure consistency across different language versions of the documentation.

@bobzhang bobzhang merged commit 208b5a7 into main Oct 14, 2024
1 check passed
@bobzhang bobzhang deleted the add-todo-syntax branch October 14, 2024 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants