-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Packer improvements #73
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK - I think I've looked at this enough to get it - a couple of doc fixes -
I am a bit confused in the residual dimensions handling - but I think let's not let that hold up progress - will catch up on it later
Co-authored-by: Wes Hinsley <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #73 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.67% 99.68%
=======================================
Files 63 63
Lines 4331 4398 +67
=======================================
+ Hits 4317 4384 +67
Misses 14 14 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Co-authored-by: Wes Hinsley <[email protected]>
The first commit (7aa5a23) fixes a small bug that I noticed when working with dust to unpack output from dust models, where we were treating "scalars" created via the
array
argument slightly differently to those created via thescalar
argument.The next couple of commits, and the bulk of this PR fixes a problem I noticed working with this, where we simply don't support packing multidimensional inputs. I don't think we'll do this very often but it felt like the current implementation was not good enough. This is surprisingly horrible to do, and I think that's reflected in the error messages and help files. This is something I feel we'll improve on over time.