Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Migrate from cameraname to sensorSelectionInfo #26

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andriymujin
Copy link
Contributor

This migration is done without any consideration for backwards compatibility because cameraname was not a valid option on the server side for almost a year. So even if there are some users of the old API - they are already broken for a while.

Issue: #25

This migration is done without any consideration for backwards compatibility because cameraname was not a valid option on the server side for almost a year. So even if there are some users of the old API - they are already broken for a while.
@andriymujin andriymujin self-assigned this Oct 3, 2023
@andriymujin
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC: @cielavenir

@felixvd
Copy link
Collaborator

felixvd commented Oct 3, 2023

Please run autotester with this and the other branch

@andriymujin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please run autotester with this and the other branch

Actually @cielavenir already triggered one: https://autotester.test.mujin.co.jp/?groupid=1&scheduleid=2&pipelineid=397923. Lets see.

@cielavenir
Copy link
Contributor

sorry @andriymujin could you resolve the conflict?

@cielavenir
Copy link
Contributor

after resolving conflict, please add ziyan as reviewer

@andriymujin andriymujin requested a review from ziyan October 9, 2023 05:26
@andriymujin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ziyan PTAL. Planning client was using cameraname instead of sensorSelectionInfo. This PR fixes it.

@andriymujin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ziyan Friendly ping

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants