Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC: tweak README #536

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from
Open

DOC: tweak README #536

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mattip
Copy link
Collaborator

@mattip mattip commented Oct 23, 2024

The README for the repo only refers to travisCI and Appveyor. The github CI is much more prevalent these days. Reword the content to mention CI-specific content less. Also, the rackspace uploads are ancient history. Mention SPEC04 and scientific-python instead.

@mattip
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mattip commented Oct 23, 2024

TODO: check that the links are still relevant, mention cibuildwheel, and hint that projects should use that instead.

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Oct 23, 2024

README.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mattip and others added 2 commits October 24, 2024 20:39
Co-authored-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>
@mattip
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mattip commented Oct 24, 2024

Should the README have a pointer to publishing-to-pypi?

Maybe. I view multibuild as a wheel building tool, I am not sure deploying wheels is in its scope. I left the bit about scientific-python-nightly-wheels for historic reasons, but maybe it makes sense to mention direct publishing as well. Although that link is only for github, right?

README.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>
@mattip
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mattip commented Oct 27, 2024

Let's put this in as-is. There is more room for improvement if someone wants to submit another PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants