RFC beginnings

RFC.md

@@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
+# The Multihash Format
+
+## Introduction
+
+TODO
+
+### Hash Functions
+
+TODO
+
+### Self Description
+
+TODO (use a definition from multiformats + example for hashes)
+
+### Example Use Cases
+
+TODO
+
+### Terminology
+
+The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
+document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119, BCP 14
+[RFC2119] and indicate requirement levels for compliant multihash
+implementations.
+
+This specification makes use of the following terminology:
+
+Varint: A variable sized unsigned integer, represented with a Most
+  Significant Bit (MSB) Varint with no size limit.
+
+Hash function: TODO
+
+Cryptographic hash function: TODO
+
+Digest: The output value of a hash function.
+
+Length-prefixed: A variable sized byte sequence, prefixed with the
+  length of the sequence. Example: "0x03aabbcc" is the sequence
+  "0xaabbcc" prefixed with the length: "0x03". For our purposes,
+  these prefixes are varints.
+
+## Multihash Function Tables
+
+A Multihash Function Table assigns a unique integer code and a
+unique string name to each hash function listed on the table.
+You can think of these tables as a list of triples, where each
+the integer code MUST be unique, the string name MUST be unique,
+and the function should be a well defined hash function:
+
+  # a multihash table is a list of triples:
+  <code> <name> <function>
+  ...
+
+  # example multihash table:
+  0x01 identity "The Identity Hash Function"
+  0x11 sha1     "The SHA1 Cryptographic Hash Function"
+  0x12 sha2-256 "The SHA256 Cryptographic Hash Function"
+  0x13 sha2-512 "The SHA512 Cryptographic Hash Function"
+  0x14 sha3-512 "The SHA3-512 Cryptographic Hash Function"
+  ...
+
+`<code>`: a unique (unsigned) integer code for a compact
+  representation of the hash function. Usually represented
+  as a varint. The table has no length limit.
+
+`<name>`: a unique string name for a more human readable
+  representation of the hash function. It is restricted to
+  the following ASCII character values: `[a-zA-Z0-9]+`. In
+  most cases, this name SHOULD be enough for a programmer
+  to know without ambiguity precisely which hash function is
+  intended.
+
+`<function>`: is a unique string name or definition of the
+  hash function. For most purposes, this MUST be enough of a
+  definition to allow a programmer to know, without any ambiguity,
+  precisely which hash function is intended. A self-describing
+  multihash table may opt to represent functions as the code
+  itself.
+
+TODO: possibly remove `<hash-function>` entirely, and rely solely
+on the `<string-code>`? Is there such a table already to rely on?
+Such a table must include both cryptographic and non-cryptographic
+hash functions.
+
+### Standard Multihash Table
+
+There is a Standard Multihash Table that all implementations
+MUST support. This table exists to provide agreement on the
+int and string codes of widely known hash functions.
+
+What level of notoriety must a hash function achieve before
+being included in the Standard Multihash Table? This question
+is left up to the maintainers of the table, presumably IANA.
+
+The current value of the Standard Multihash Table is:
+
+  # 0x10-0x3f reserved for SHA standard functions
+  # 0x60-0x7f reserved for custom hash functions
+  # 0x3000-0x3fff reserved for custom hash functions
+  # code, name
+  0x00, identity
+  0x11, sha1
+  0x12, sha2-256
+  0x13, sha2-512
+  0x14, sha3-512
+  0x15, sha3-384
+  0x16, sha3-256
+  0x17, sha3-224
+  0x18, shake-128
+  0x19, shake-256
+  0x40, blake2b
+  0x41, blake2s
+
+TODO: either add the `<function>` part or NOT.
+
+The Standard Multihash Table reserves some ranges for growth,
+and for custom tables:
+
+0x01-0x3f: reserved for SHA standard functions.
+
+A fourth of all integers is reserved for custom tables. That
+way, neither the numbers for the standard table nor for custom
+tables can run out. The reserved numbers are at the upper
+fourth of every varint range. This means the following ranges,
+and the series they imply:
+
+  0d96    to 0d127   or 0b1100000        to 0b1111111
+  0d12288 to 0d16383 or 0b11000000000000 to 0b11111111111111
+
+Put another way: every varint byte contributes 7 bits to the
+number. We say that all numbers whose 7-bit representation
+starts with 0b11..., are reserved for custom tables. This
+is a fourth of all numbers, and yields the sequence above.
+
+TODO: check if the above makes sense readily, or we want a
+better explanation or a better range.
+
+### Custom Tables
+
+Uses MAY create custom multihash tables to use custom hash
+functions not defined in the Standard Multihash Table. In
+order to avoid any ambiguity whatsoever, these custom tables
+MUST be strict super-sets of the Standard Multihash Table.
+Therefore, they MUST define any custom functions with the
+integer codes reserved for this purpose, and must use string
+names that begin with `x-`.
+
+  # example custom table. superset of SMT
+  # 0x01-0x0f reserved for application specific functions
+  # 0x10-0x3f reserved for SHA standard functions
+  0x00, identity
+  0x11, sha1
+  0x12, sha2-256
+  0x13, sha2-512
+  0x14, sha3-512
+  0x15, sha3-384
+  0x16, sha3-256
+  0x17, sha3-224
+  0x18, shake-128
+  0x19, shake-256
+  0x40, blake2b
+  0x41, blake2s
+
+### Self-Describing Multihash Tables
+
+It is possible to define a multihash table using completely
+self-describing definitions, meaning that the hash function
+itself is stored not by name but as a code value. How to do
+that is left up to future specifications. If one is defined,
+this specification SHOULD be updated to link to it.
+
+## Specification of the multihash format
+
+Multihash is a self-describing format to store, transmit, and
+display hash function digest values. It is unambiguous, provides
+"algorithmic agility", prevents "algorithm lock-in", improves the
+security of hash value transmissions, and improves the usability
+of hash functions.
+
+The multihash format is very simple. It defines a single value
+type: a multihash value. A multihash value consists of three parts:
+
+1. Hash Function Code: an integer code representing a hash
+  function from a pre-determined hash function table, expressed
+  as a varint.
+2. Digest Length: the length of the hash function digest value,
+  expressed as a varint.
+3. Digest Value: the hash function digest value, conforming to
+  the Digest Length
+
+These three parts are laid out in a byte sequence as follows:
+
+    <hash-function-code><digest-length><digest-value>
+
+The multihash format defines two representations for a multihash
+value:
+
+1. Packed Representation: a compact representation for use
+  on the wire, in storage, in displays, and in other identifiers.
+2. Explanation Representation: a larger, human readable
+  representation to make distinguishing values easier on
+  developers.
+
+Both representations follow the same parts order as above, only
+changing each of the parts.
+
+For all intents and purposes, the Packed Representation is the
+main contribution of this specification. The Explanation
+Representation is merely here to provide a single standard way to
+dump out values in more readable forms.
+
+### Packed Representation
+
+The Packed Representation is a compact representation optimized
+for transmitting, storing, displaying, and using multihashes.
+It is optimized to avoid wasting space. It is also tuned to be
+incorporated into other values, such as content-addressed store
+identifiers, URI/URLs, unix filesystem paths, and more. This is
+the primary representation of a multihash format.
+
+The Packed Representation is structured as follows:
+
+    <hash-function-code-v><digest-length-v><digest-value-bin>
+
+Where:
+- `<hash-function-code-v>` is a varint storing the code of the hash function
+  according to a pre-determined multihash table, and the Standard Multihash
+  Table.
+- `<digest-length-v>` is a varint storing the length of `<digest-value>`,
+  in bytes.
+- `<digest-value-bin>` is the hash function digest value, binary-packed.
+
+#### Hash Function Code
+
+The Hash Function Code in the packed representation is an unsigned
+varint, following the format specified in section (TODO). This code
+references a pre-determined multihash table, usually the standard
+Standard Multihash Table maintained alongside this specification.
+
+It is possible for users to define and use their own tables, which
+MUST be compatible with the Standard Multihash Table, by using
+only the code ranges left undefined for this purpose. Section (TODO)
+explains the Standard Multihash Table and which ranges can be used.
+
+#### Digest Length in Bytes
+
+The `<digest-length>` counts bytes, not bits. This reduces the storage
+required for most hash function values: 256 and 512 bit lengths are
+represented as "32" and "64", using 1-byte varints instead of 2-byte
+varints.
+
+This size reduction exploits the facts that: (a) most common computer
+architectures use 8-bit words, (b) most networks transit sequences of
+bytes, (c) most storage systems store sequences of bytes, and (d) most
+if not all widely used hash functions have standard digest lengths
+divisible by 8.
+
+It is possible that some hash functions are used with digests of lengths
+not evenly divisble by 8. In such rare cases, the function implementation
+with multihash should define a byte-aligned version, usually by adding a
+pre-determined amount of padding bits at the end of the value. Such
+padding transformations can be well-defined, and would likely have to
+exist to support such hash functions in current computer architectures,
+storage systems, and networks. Therefore this specification is comfortable
+leaving this up to the implementations and users.
+
+#### Digest Value
+
+The `<digest-value-bin>` is simply a binary-packed representation of the
+hash function value. This value ensures the entire Multihash Packed
+Representation is as compact as it could be, wasting no space to
+represent the digest value.
+
+Base encoding for strings must be performed around the whole multihash
+value,
+
+### Explanation Representation
+
+The Explanation Representation is a well defined way of representing
+the hash functions in a human-readable optimized way. It is wasteful
+explicitly, and not meant to be used as an identifier in systems.
+
+The Explanation Representation is
+
+    <hash-function-name>.<digest-length>.<digest-value-hex>
+
+Where:
+- `<hash-function-name>` is the string name of the code of the hash
+  function according to a pre-determined multihash table, and the
+  Standard Multihash Table.
+- `<digest-lengt>` is a decimal number storing the length of
+  `<digest-value>`, in bytes.
+- `<digest-value-hex>` is the hash function digest value, hex-encoded.
+- `.` is a delimiter for the values.
+
+This representation SHOULD NOT be used to transmit, store, or embed a
+multihash value. It SHOULD only be used for debugging.
+
+Even when creating human-oriented string identifiers, it is strongly
+RECOMMENDED to use the packed representation of multihash, possibly
+encoded in a convenient base. This ensures the whole multihash value
+is as compact as it can be, and does not accidentally impose other
+requirements on the transmission of the value. It is much easier for
+systems to deal with a binary value that can be easily encoded in a
+variety of bases. Using the Explanation Representation for storage,
+transmission, embedding in other identifiers, or anything other
+than debugging, defeats the purpose of multihash.
+
+### MSB Unsigned Varints - muvints
+
+Multihash uses muvints, Most-significant-bit Unsigned Variable
+INTegerS. These are in use by other multiformats. Their definition
+is summarized here for completeness.
+
+Unsigned: muvints are unsigned integers. There is no need for
+  distinguishing negative integers.
+
+Varints: muvints are variable integers, with no limit.
+
+MSB continuation: muvints use the Most Significant Bit of every byte
+  to represent a continuation bit. This type of varint is optimized
+  for space and reads of small numbers, not for reads of very large
+  numbers (128-bit ints and beyond).
+
+Little-Endian: muvints are based on Protocol Buffers varints, and
+  are thus little-endian, meaning the least significant bytes are
+  encoded first.
+
+Examples:
+
+  # decimal   muvint bytes
+  127         01111111
+  128         10000000 00000001
+  256         10000000 00000010
+  1024        10000000 00001000
+  16384       10000000 10000000 00000001
+
+## Encoding multihashes
+
+Multihashes are designed to be used as values in a variety of
+mediums. They will often need to be encoded in other bases.
+In particular, multihash endeavors to keep the function code
+and length in the same base encoding as the digest value, which
+is important to many applications that must treat hash digest
+values opaquely, or that may have base encoding restrictions.
+
+Binary: It is RECOMMENDED that multihash values are stored
+  and transmitted on the wire as binary packed values wherever
+  possible. This will ensure the hash digests take up as little
+  space as possible.
+
+Copiable: It is RECOMMENDED that multihash values are displayed
+  to users in a "copiable" form, that is in a form easy to select,
+  copy, and paste, which typically means in base16, base32, base58.
+
+Multibase: Multihash pairs well with Multibase, a standard for
+  self-describing base encodings. This way, a multihash value can
+  be stored, transmitted, or displayed in any base without any
+  ambiguity.
+
+
+## Considerations
+
+### Implementation considerations
+
+TODO
+
+### IANA considerations
+
+It is RECOMMENDED that IANA host the Standard Multihash Table.
+
+### Security considerations
+
+It is RECOMMENDED that implementations establish a reasonable
+upper bound on varint sizes to avoid allocating large buffers,
+or potential buffer overflows. This limit will make sense at given
+times, depending on the size of the tables and common sizes for
+the digests of commonly used hash functions. Such a limit is
+explicitly left out of this specification as it is liable to be
+an incorrect choice as time passes.
+
+## Acknowledgements
+
+Special thanks to the following people for helping to define,
+implement, review, and extend multihash:
+
+TODO list contributors
+
+
+## References
+
+TODO
+