Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rc/v1.7.next1 #436

Merged
merged 80 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

Rc/v1.7.next1 #436

merged 80 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

sstanculeanu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sstanculeanu sstanculeanu self-assigned this Mar 14, 2024
sstanculeanu and others added 20 commits April 4, 2024 22:20
…ayedv3_2024.04.04

Merge rc17next1 into feat relayedv3 2024.04.04
…24.05.09

Merge rc170 into rc17next1 2024.05.09
fixed process-status on relayed v1 with move balance
…d_with_unexecutable_move_balance

Added proper return on /process-status for un-executable relayed move balance
…ayedv3_2024.06.05

Merge rc17next1 into feat relayedv3 2024.06.05
…in-proxy-go into multiple_inner_txs

# Conflicts:
#	go.mod
#	go.sum
#	process/transactionProcessor.go
danidrasovean and others added 22 commits August 9, 2024 14:48
Replaced 'hash' with 'nonce' in get-by-nonce description
* fix get transaction endpoint

* empty scr list

* fix rcv address

* pending scr check

* unit tests

* fix

* remove folder

* fix

* fixes after merge

* fixes after review
Fix process status appending nil values on logs
* fix

* one more fix

* fix

* cleanup
…ervers

Get number of shards from observers
@sstanculeanu sstanculeanu marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2024 15:29
miiu96
miiu96 previously approved these changes Nov 13, 2024
@sstanculeanu sstanculeanu changed the base branch from rc/v1.7.0 to master November 13, 2024 19:16
@sstanculeanu sstanculeanu dismissed miiu96’s stale review November 13, 2024 19:16

The base branch was changed.

@sstanculeanu sstanculeanu merged commit a01b39c into master Nov 13, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants