0.4.19 release notes #3
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Wouter-Michiel Vierdag <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lorenzo Gaifas <[email protected]>
|
Small copy edits. |
Co-authored-by: Peter Sobolewski <[email protected]>
highlight/0.4.19.md
Outdated
| we expect that in the next release we will ship bundle with pydantic 2. | ||
| So if your plugin is using pydantic please make sure that it is compatible with pydantic 2. | ||
| ([napari/napari/#6358](https://github.com/napari/napari/pull/6358)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| we expect that in the next release we will ship bundle with pydantic 2. | |
| So if your plugin is using pydantic please make sure that it is compatible with pydantic 2. | |
| ([napari/napari/#6358](https://github.com/napari/napari/pull/6358)) | |
| we expect the next release to ship with pydantic 2 bundled. | |
| If your plugin is using pydantic please make sure that it is compatible with pydantic 2. | |
| ([napari/napari/#6358](https://github.com/napari/napari/pull/6358)) |
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nope. we will not bundle pydantic 2 in napair. We will ship pydantic 2 in a bundle installer (so it will affect only downloadable executables, not installed from pip/conda).
highlight/0.4.19.md
Outdated
| So if your plugin is using pydantic please make sure that it is compatible with pydantic 2. | ||
| ([napari/napari/#6358](https://github.com/napari/napari/pull/6358)) | ||
|
|
||
| Lastly we have fixed performance problem with label layer by move part of calculation on GPU |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Lastly we have fixed performance problem with label layer by move part of calculation on GPU | |
| Lastly we have fixed performance problem with label layer by moving part of calculation on GPU |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm. I think that we will need to rewrite this part totally as we now working on updating of mechanism.
|
This seems like way too much details for the highlights. I would say just enough so people know to use smaller unsigned dtypes if performance is an issue, but no need to explain the how/why and point to all the PR in the highlights. |
|
Is it worth reminding people of the |
I think yes.
Maybe yes. I'm not best text writter |
* add 6102 as a feature highlight * copy edits Co-authored-by: Melissa Weber Mendonça <[email protected]> * fix pr link --------- Co-authored-by: Melissa Weber Mendonça <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lorenzo Gaifas <[email protected]>
This ensures it is now dripping with enthusiasm (much deserved) =P
| ### BIG improvements to the Labels layer | ||
|
|
||
| [#3308](https://github.com/napari/napari/pull/3308) closed *many* long-standing | ||
| bugs in the handling of colors in the Labels layer: the color swatch in the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| bugs in the handling of colors in the Labels layer: the color swatch in the | |
| bugs in the handling of colors in the Labels layer: the color switch in the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nope, swatch is correct: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/swatch
|
@Czaki Thanks for the script updates, they look great. Can I push here again? I'll move the API changes note to the relevant section, and I'll make a note in the deprecations section for napari/napari#6542. |
|
yes |
|
Ok. I put a space in |
Initial patches for 0.4.19 release