Check role when receiving status updates in the Operator Status Indicator

[scottbell]

Closes #7508

Describe your changes:

Add a simple check to make sure the incoming status matches our role.

All Submissions:

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
• Is this change backwards compatible? For example, developers won't need to change how they are calling the API or how they've extended core plugins such as Tables or Plots.

Author Checklist

• Changes address original issue?
• Tests included and/or updated with changes?
• Has this been smoke tested?
• Have you associated this PR with a type: label? Note: this is not necessarily the same as the original issue.
• Have you associated a milestone with this PR? Note: leave blank if unsure.
• Is this a breaking change to be called out in the release notes?
• Testing instructions included in associated issue OR is this a dependency/testcase change?

Reviewer Checklist

• Changes appear to address issue?
• Reviewer has tested changes by following the provided instructions?
• Changes appear not to be breaking changes?
• Appropriate automated tests included?
• Code style and in-line documentation are appropriate?

[scottbell]

Note this is rather difficult to test as we need other status roles available feeding us their status changes, even when we haven't asked for them.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (317ea8c) 55.23% compared to head (2973a59) 61.93%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7509      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.23%   61.93%   +6.69%     
==========================================
  Files         671      428     -243     
  Lines       27010    13361   -13649     
  Branches     2631        0    -2631     
==========================================
- Hits        14919     8275    -6644     
+ Misses      11361     5086    -6275     
+ Partials      730        0     -730     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
e2e-full	41.12% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 317ea8c
e2e-stable	59.44% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
unit	?

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

see 374 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 317ea8c...2973a59. Read the comment docs.

[ozyx]

LGTM