Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency @neinteractiveliterature/litform to v0.32.0 #9922

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 13, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@neinteractiveliterature/litform 0.30.0 -> 0.32.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

neinteractiveliterature/litform (@​neinteractiveliterature/litform)

v0.32.0

Compare Source

Changes

v0.31.1

Compare Source

Changes

  • Fix husky postinstall script error

v0.31.0

Compare Source

Changes


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/neinteractiveliterature-litform-0.x branch 29 times, most recently from 6345260 to bf9a428 Compare December 16, 2024 19:23
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/neinteractiveliterature-litform-0.x branch 24 times, most recently from acf9b41 to dc772dc Compare December 20, 2024 13:07
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/neinteractiveliterature-litform-0.x branch from dc772dc to 9203aba Compare December 20, 2024 15:17
Copy link
Contributor

Code Coverage Report: Only Changed Files listed

Package Coverage
Overall Coverage 🟢 85%

Minimum allowed coverage is 0%, this run produced 85%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants