-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 10-3.cgel #34
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update 10-3.cgel #34
Conversation
Add POS tags to verbs
Removed redundant lemma tags
As discussed on 08/29, though, there’s a prima facie tension with analyzing this of-PP as [1] https://github.com/nert-nlp/legal-cgel/blob/main/datasets/oneoff/9-2.cgel |
|
"by" PP Mod-> Comp
Changed instances of "of" to Comp, following discussion with Brandon. Reattached "for service of notice..." higher at "prescribed." In terms of "in an action in the same court," I'm having trouble understanding the actual meaning of this sentence in context, causing problems for accurate annotation. Can we discuss what this sentence is actually trying to say to better understand attachment/possible ambiguity?
Does in an action in the same court have multiple attachment sites? Otherwise looks ready to merge in |
Upon review, I think there are potentially many attachment sites (one could argue that almost every preposition in that statement could have several different attachments...), but out of context I'm not sure which ones are valid interpretations in terms of what the law is trying to say |
Added interpretation of ambiguity for "service of notice of motion in an action in the same court." It's very thorny though, so definitely needs review as we may disagree on how many/what meaningful readings exist/
"such" --> D
No description provided.