Bump dependencies (kube client, prom model...) (#500) [1.4 backport]

[jotak]

• Bump dependencies (kube client, prom model...)

• Fix service with empty ClusterIP triggering errors

• Use ClusterIPs list, instead of ClusterIP single field, to check for empty ips
• Just ignore empty ones rather than throwing an error

Bump k8s.io/apimachinery from 0.28.2 to 0.28.3 (#528)

• Bump k8s.io/apimachinery from 0.28.2 to 0.28.3

Bumps k8s.io/apimachinery from 0.28.2 to 0.28.3.

• Commits

---

updated-dependencies:

• dependency-name: k8s.io/apimachinery dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ...

• Add other bumps

---

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from jotak. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release-1.4@6027627). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             release-1.4     #530   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage               ?   65.99%           
==============================================
  Files                  ?       94           
  Lines                  ?     6935           
  Branches               ?        0           
==============================================
  Hits                   ?     4577           
  Misses                 ?     2099           
  Partials               ?      259           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	65.99% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jpinsonneau]

Code looks good, just ensure flows are not dropped as seen in the metadata PR with similar changes on ClusterIPs checks before merge.

[jotak]

closing per agreement to minimize changes in 1.4.2