Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Add ipsec support #805

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Will this change affect NetObserv / Network Observability operator? If not, you can ignore the rest of this checklist.
  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from msherif1234. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Jan 31, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Jan 31, 2025
Signed-off-by: Mohamed Mahmoud <[email protected]>
@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Jan 31, 2025
Copy link

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/flowlogs-pipeline:18c31bd

It will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running:

USER=netobserv VERSION=18c31bd make set-flp-image

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.08%. Comparing base (26a74b7) to head (1d3747d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #805      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.06%   65.08%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         113      113              
  Lines        8621     8621              
==========================================
+ Hits         5609     5611       +2     
+ Misses       2685     2684       -1     
+ Partials      327      326       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 65.08% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants