NETOBSERV-1803: Allow flow filtering for L4 protocols using two ports

[msherif1234]

Description

Allow filtering TCP/UDP/SCTP using two ports syntax like "90,100" to filter either on port 90 or 100

Dependencies

netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent#389

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

[openshift-ci-robot]

@msherif1234: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1803 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Description

Allow filtering TCP/UDP/SCTP using two ports syntax like "90,100" to filter either on port 90 or 100

Dependencies

netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent#389

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• Does this PR require product documentation?
• If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
• If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
• If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
• Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
• Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
• No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[msherif1234]

/ok-to-test

[github-actions]

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-cli:60550b9

It will expire after two weeks.

To use this build, update your commands using:

USER=netobserv VERSION=60550b9 make commands

or download the updated commands.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.10%. Comparing base (dd4a15c) to head (fec871a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #84   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   25.10%   25.10%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines        1147     1147           
=======================================
  Hits          288      288           
  Misses        838      838           
  Partials       21       21           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	25.10% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[jpinsonneau]

@msherif1234 could you please rebase ?

[msherif1234]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: msherif1234

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [msherif1234]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment