Replace ACG by Random123

[alkino]

The last one.

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ 0678ba4 -> Azure artifacts URL

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.07%. Comparing base (625f3d1) to head (75aafb5).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3190   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.06%   67.07%           
=======================================
  Files         570      569    -1     
  Lines      111232   111204   -28     
=======================================
- Hits        74599    74590    -9     
+ Misses      36633    36614   -19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[azure-pipelines]

✔️ 75aafb5 -> Azure artifacts URL

[bbpbuildbot]

Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #238144 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here!

Status and direct links:

• ✅ mac_m1_cmake_build: [cmake, ON, OFF, OFF, address]
• ✅ spack_setup
• ✅ build:nmodl
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:intel:legacy
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:intel:shared
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:acc:legacy
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:acc:shared
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:omp:legacy
• ✅ build:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:omp
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:intel:legacy
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:intel:shared
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:acc:legacy
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:acc:shared
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:omp:legacy
• ✅ test:neuron:nmodl:nvhpc:omp

[github-actions]

NEURON ModelDB CI: launching for 75aafb5 via its drop url

[alkino]

There is differences in nrn-modeldb that we shoud analyze.

[nrnhines]

There is differences in nrn-modeldb that we shoud analyze.

I agree. It's a bit time consuming and I have little doubt it's due to different random values. But it should be checked. I will do that.

I verified that the differences for the 15 models were due to the change in default randomness. Model 18502 was particularly different but was still due to randomness and much more similar results for the graphs were obtained with
Random123_globalindex(1)