Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: don't remove needs info label when commenting on a stale issue #48892

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

kesselb
Copy link
Contributor

@kesselb kesselb commented Oct 25, 2024

Summary

  1. Removing the "needs info" label when someone comments on a stale issue seems incorrect.

  2. By default, the stale action removes the "stale" label upon commenting. However, the labels-to-remove-when-unstale option triggers an additional API request to remove the "stale" label, which was already removed in the previous API call.

Test issue:
#38495 (to see that needs info and stale are removed with the current configuration)

Workflow log:
Screenshot From 2024-10-25 14-13-27

Checklist

1) Removing the "needs info" label when someone comments on a stale issue seems incorrect.
2) By default, the stale action removes the "stale" label upon commenting. However, the labels-to-remove-when-unstale option triggers an additional API request to remove the "stale" label, which was already removed in the previous API call.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Kesselberg <[email protected]>
@kesselb kesselb added the 3. to review Waiting for reviews label Oct 25, 2024
@kesselb kesselb self-assigned this Oct 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@szaimen szaimen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐘

@kesselb kesselb merged commit 4f6667a into master Oct 25, 2024
179 checks passed
@kesselb kesselb deleted the update-stale-bot-configuration branch October 25, 2024 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review Waiting for reviews
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants