You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What's your take here on cell-type assignment by atlas-mapping? In my experience, these approaches work best, but are of course limited by the availability of such an atlas and are conceptually different than the methods mentioned above.
The future will bring "foundational models" that are trained on all available data. scsimilarity goes in that direction -- it generates a low-dimensional embedding and cell-type labels in one go.
This sounds very interesting.
Implementation-wise the pipeline can produce labels+embeddings in one step already. An example of this is how the SCANVI process is implemented.
If I may add, first iteration of cell type label assignment is better with some of the well benchmarked tool untill foundational models are fully operational and trustworthy. From cell type classification purposes, this first iteration label + embedding can still be reassigned and improved with human intervention if labels are a bit off, which will be case-specific (most likely depending on organ/tissue and disease type). So atlas level data will always serve as better ground truth training and for classification purposes with any of the transformer based or pure ML or Neural Network based models in future. So if such comes better, that can be implemented as a process.
Description of feature
The following methods look interesting:
Tasks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: