-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify rose #5
Conversation
|
@LeonHafner we should investigate if we can replace this with a sequence of |
When I run the pipeline version from your pull request, I receive fewer enhancer regions from the ROSE processes than with the current dev branch. The regions output by ChromHMM still seem to be identical to the dev branch. Can you reproduce this or do you know where this comes from? |
Might be because the UCSC file that we used for ROSE is not identical with the genepred that is currently inserted into ROSE |
We could find this out by removing the first row and column from the UCSC file and manually running the process in one of its working directories |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested the workflow by using the old rose ucsc file and manually overwriting the UCSC_GTFTOGENEPRED
output.
Results are equal to dev
, so feel free to merge!
Great, thanks! |
This PR aims on simplifiying the ROSE implementation so that fewer pipeline parameters and processes are needed.