Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RF: Simplify high-pass filtering in algorithms.confounds #3651

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

effigies
Copy link
Member

Legendre and cosine detrending are implemented almost identically, although with several minor variations. Here I separate regressor creation from detrending to unify the implementations.

This now uses np.linalg.pinv(X) to estimate the betas in both cases, rather than using np.linalg.lstsq in the cosine filter. lstsq uses SVD and can thus fail to converge in rare cases. Under no circumstances should (X.T @ X) be singular, so the pseudoinverse is unique and precisely what we want.

Issue raised in https://neurostars.org/t/fmriprep-numpy-linalg-linalg-linalgerror-svd-did-not-converge/29525.

effigies added 2 commits May 30, 2024 10:50
Legendre and cosine detrending are implemented almost identically,
although with several minor variations. Here I separate regressor
creation from detrending to unify the implementations.

This now uses `np.linalg.pinv(X)` to estimate the betas in both cases,
rather than using `np.linalg.lstsq` in the cosine filter. lstsq uses SVD
and can thus fail to converge in rare cases. Under no circumstances
should (X.T @ X) be singular, so the pseudoinverse is unique and
precisely what we want.
@effigies effigies force-pushed the rf/simplify_detrend branch from 4dde564 to 4717e23 Compare May 30, 2024 14:50
@effigies
Copy link
Member Author

@jhlegarreta I wonder if I could bug you for a review. I suspect this would be a quick one for you, but let me know if it's not.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 30, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.47%. Comparing base (4d1352a) to head (4dde564).

Current head 4dde564 differs from pull request most recent head 17bac08

Please upload reports for the commit 17bac08 to get more accurate results.

Files Patch % Lines
nipype/algorithms/confounds.py 85.71% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3651      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.83%   70.47%   -0.36%     
==========================================
  Files        1276     1276              
  Lines       59314    59305       -9     
  Branches     9824     9822       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        42013    41797     -216     
- Misses      16125    16353     +228     
+ Partials     1176     1155      -21     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

effigies added 2 commits May 30, 2024 11:11
For Legendre regressors, the ith column is the ith-order polynomial, so
the constant column is 0. For the cosine regressors, a constant column
was appended to the end, in contradiction of the docstring. This brings
both into alignment so columns are sorted from lowest to highest
frequency and aligns the DCT behavior with its docstring.
Copy link

@jhlegarreta jhlegarreta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Take my review with some care: I am not familiar with fMRI data processing.

Changes look sensible; the methods being changed are not tested, though 😬. Documenting the methods would help 📖.

Thanks for addressing the reported issue so fast.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants