-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: renovate #186
fix: renovate #186
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves modifications to the project's configuration files. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)renovate.json (2)Line range hint The removal of Let's verify the current pre-commit configuration and recent updates: ✅ Verification successfulLet me check the content of the pre-commit configuration file to understand the current setup. Pre-commit updates will continue to work as expected despite packageRules removal The removal of the
The change simply moves from pre-commit-specific grouping to grouping all updates together, which is a valid approach for maintaining dependencies. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check pre-commit configuration and recent updates
# Check if there are any recent PRs related to pre-commit updates
gh pr list --search "pre-commit in:title" --limit 5 --json number,title,state
# Look for any pre-commit specific configurations in the codebase
rg -l "pre-commit" --type yaml --type json
Length of output: 163 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the content of pre-commit config file
cat .pre-commit-config.yaml
# Also check if there were any previous renovate configurations
git show HEAD^:renovate.json 2>/dev/null || echo "Previous version not found"
Length of output: 2998
Adding Consider the following trade-offs:
Let's check the current dependency structure to assess the impact: ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the repository structure and dependencies to better assess the impact of grouping. Grouping dependencies is appropriate for this project's scope Based on the repository analysis, grouping all dependencies with
The trade-offs mentioned in the original review comment are less concerning given the project's scope and update frequency. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze project dependencies to understand grouping impact
# Check Python dependencies
if [ -f "requirements.txt" ]; then
echo "Python dependencies:"
cat requirements.txt
fi
# Check package.json if exists
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo "Node.js dependencies:"
jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies' package.json
fi
# Check pre-commit hooks
if [ -f ".pre-commit-config.yaml" ]; then
echo "Pre-commit hooks:"
cat .pre-commit-config.yaml
fi
Length of output: 2588 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for Python project files and dependencies
echo "=== Python Project Files ==="
fd -e py -e pyproject.toml -e requirements.txt -e setup.py -e setup.cfg
# Check for Node.js related files
echo -e "\n=== Node.js Project Files ==="
fd -e js -e ts -e json -E '.git' -E 'renovate.json'
# Check for other potential dependency files
echo -e "\n=== Other Dependency Files ==="
fd -e yaml -e yml -E '.pre-commit-config.yaml' -E '.github'
# Check current renovate.json content
echo -e "\n=== Current Renovate Config ==="
cat renovate.json
Length of output: 988 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Description
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
docformatter
hook from pre-commit configuration.New Features
pretty-format-toml
hook for improved code formatting.Chores
renovate.json
configuration to streamline package management and update scheduling.