Add decorated Kan-on romanization #56
Conversation
| if (is`ε ₯θ² δΈη`) { | ||
| if (is`εΉ«η΅`) return 'Ε«k'; | ||
| if (is`δ»₯ζ―`) return 'αΊΔ«k'; | ||
| return is`θη΅ ζ η« η΅` ? 'yΕ«k' : 'wΔ«k'; | ||
| } | ||
| if (is`δΈη`) { | ||
| return is`εΉ«η΅` ? 'Ε«ng' : 'iΕ«ng'; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| if (is`ε ₯θ² δΈη`) { | |
| if (is`εΉ«η΅`) return 'Ε«k'; | |
| if (is`δ»₯ζ―`) return 'αΊΔ«k'; | |
| return is`θη΅ ζ η« η΅` ? 'yΕ«k' : 'wΔ«k'; | |
| } | |
| if (is`δΈη`) { | |
| return is`εΉ«η΅` ? 'Ε«ng' : 'iΕ«ng'; | |
| } | |
| if (is`δΈη`) { | |
| if (is`θθ²`) return is`εΉ«η΅` ? 'Ε«ng' : 'iΕ«ng'; | |
| if (is`εΉ«η΅`) return 'Ε«k'; | |
| if (is`δ»₯ζ―`) return 'αΊΔ«k'; | |
| return is`θη« η΅` ? 'yΕ«k' : 'wΔ«k'; | |
| } |
It seems like this is the only case that there are differences between θθ² and ε ₯θ² (not including nasal β plosive codas)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, it's one of a few inconsistencies in attested Kan-on that I've incorporated in here, on a somewhat arbitrary basis. I had to make a judgment call as to which ones were worth keeping. I think the rationale here was, there are a fair amount of common characters with common Kan-on that reflected these differences.
| if (is`εε£ ι(θ¦η΅ ζ ε½±η΅ ζ δ»₯ζ―)`) return 'uΓ―'; | ||
| if (is`εε£`) return is`δ»₯ζ― ζ (ιη΄Aι‘ (εΉ«η΅ ζ θ¦η΅ ζ ε½±η΅))` ? 'αΊΓ―' : 'wΓ―'; | ||
| return is`δ»₯ζ― ζ (ιη΄Aι‘ (εΉ«η΅ ζ θ¦η΅ ζ ε½±η΅))` ? 'yΓ―' : 'Γ―'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| if (is`εε£ ι(θ¦η΅ ζ ε½±η΅ ζ δ»₯ζ―)`) return 'uΓ―'; | |
| if (is`εε£`) return is`δ»₯ζ― ζ (ιη΄Aι‘ (εΉ«η΅ ζ θ¦η΅ ζ ε½±η΅))` ? 'αΊΓ―' : 'wΓ―'; | |
| return is`δ»₯ζ― ζ (ιη΄Aι‘ (εΉ«η΅ ζ θ¦η΅ ζ ε½±η΅))` ? 'yΓ―' : 'Γ―'; | |
| if (is`εε£ ι(θ¦ε½±η΅ ζ δ»₯ζ―)`) return 'uΓ―'; | |
| if (is`εε£`) return is`δ»₯ζ― ζ ιη΄Aι‘ ιι³` ? 'αΊΓ―' : 'wΓ―'; | |
| return is`δ»₯ζ― ζ ιη΄Aι‘ ιι³` ? 'yΓ―' : 'Γ―'; |
and so on
ιι³ can actually be omitted, IIRC
Co-authored-by: ε½’η΄ ε’ιγ»γγγ΅γγΌγ <[email protected]>
|
@syimyuzya @untunt Wanna review before merging? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The question is, why this should be included in qieyun-examples? π€ (It IS a great notation system IMO though, for indroduction of Middle Chinese for those familiar with Kan-on)
To me, the schemes are alreay too many for us to maintain in this single repo, and there has been plans to drop support for most of them on the next update of Qieyun.js (if any soon π).
Not sure who you're asking π but maybe it would be a good idea to formalize some "criteria for inclusion" and document them here in this repo. I just saw there were a few other obscure Middle Chinese notations here, so I figured one more would be welcome.
Thanks π
Fair enough. If it helps, I can make sure to handle any necessary updates to this file in the event or a Qieyun.js update. |
If that's gonna be the case, it will probably be "TUPA and reconstructions of MC or Old Mandarin only" (not even Polyhedron's romanization would make it) π |
Hi π
I have a Middle Chinese notation system a little like ayaka's "ηΆΎι¦ζθι³η³»". I think it would be nice to add it to the qieyun autoderiver, if possible.