Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sharktank] Evaluation - Add Perplexity test #286

Merged
merged 58 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

archana-ramalingam
Copy link
Collaborator

Add Perplexity test for LLM evaluation

Copy link
Member

@ScottTodd ScottTodd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The diff between the original and this PR looks good to make progress while keeping the other CI builds working.

I would like to see my other comments addressed at some point though:

  • Have the test download/cache the input gguf/json files instead of assume that they exist at some /data/extra/models/ path on the CI runner, so developers can also run these tests themselves.
  • Organize requirements.txt into sharktank/requirements-tests.txt so we can track what each subproject needs for devs/users/tests at a fine granularity.

Copy link
Contributor

@IanNod IanNod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor comments that could be done in a follow up PR

@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we just store these values in a npy file or something and retrieve from sharkblobs?

@archana-ramalingam archana-ramalingam merged commit d181d67 into main Oct 19, 2024
9 checks passed
@archana-ramalingam archana-ramalingam deleted the perplexity-test branch October 19, 2024 06:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants