Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
RT-5.7 TestPlan: Aggregate All Not Viable - README for new test (open…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
rszarecki authored Sep 20, 2023
1 parent b9d8dfa commit ec54355
Showing 1 changed file with 149 additions and 0 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
# RT-5.7 Aggregate Not Viable All

## Summary

Test forwarding-viable with LAG and routing

Ensure that when **all LAG member** become set with forwarding-viable == FALSE.
- forwarding-viable=false impact **only** transmit traffic on all member port.
- All member ports set with forwarding-viable=false can receive all type of
traffic and forward it normally (same as with forwarding-viable=true)
- ISIS adjacency is established on LAG port w/ all member set to
forwarding-viable == FALSE
- Traffic that normally egress LAG with all members set to forwarding-viable ==
FALSE is forwarded by the next best egress interface/LAG.

## Procedure

```
LAG_2
+------------+ +-------------+ p2 . p2 +--------------+
| ATE | | +-------;-:--------+ ATE |
| | | + - - - + + - - - -| |
| | | + - - - + + - - - -| .-------.|
|.-------. | | +-------+-+--------+ ( pfx2 )
( pfx1 ) | . | | p7 : ; p7 | `-------'|
|`-------' | p1 ; : p1 | DUT | ' | .-------.|
| |----+-+-----| | | ( pfx3 )
| | | | | | p8 . p8 | `-------'|
| | | | | +-------;-:--------+ .-------.|
| | : ; | | | | | ( pfx4 )
| | ' | | | | | `-------'|
| | LAG_1 | +-------+-+--------+ |
+------------+ +-------------+ p9 : ; p9 +--------------+
'
LAG_3
```

- Connect ATE port-1 to DUT port-1, and ATE ports 2 through 7 to DUT ports 2-7,
and ATE ports 8, 9 to DUT ports 8, 9
- Configure ATE and DUT ports 1 to be LAG_1 w/ LACP running.
- Configure ATE and DUT ports 2-7 to be LAG_2 w/ LACP running.
- Configure ATE and DUT ports 8-9 to be LAG_3 w/ LACP running.
- Establish ISIS adjacencies on LAG_1, LAG_2, LAG_3.
1. Advertise one network prefix (pfx1) from ATE LAG_1
1. Advertise one network prefix (pfx2) from ATE LAG_2 and ATE LAG_3.
- Establish iBGP between ATE and DUT over LGA_1 using LAG_1 interface IPs and advertise prefix pfx3 with BGP NH from pfx2 range.
- Programm via gRIBI route for prefix pfx4 with single NHG pointing LAG_2 (al
ports are forwarding-viable at this point).

- For ISIS cost of LAG_2 lower then ISIS cost of LAG_3:
- Run traffic:
- From prefix pfx1 to all three: pfx2, pfx3, pfx4
- From prefix pfx2 to: pfx1
- Make the forwarding-viable transitions from TRUE --> FALSE on ports 3-7
within the LAG_2 on the DUT
- ensure that only DUT port 2 of LAG ports has bidirectional traffic.
- Ensure there is no traffic transmitted out of DUT ports 3-7
- ensure that traffic is received on all port2-7 and delivered to ATE port1
- ensure there are no packet losses in steady state (no congestion).
- Ensure there is no traffic received on DUT LAG_3
- Ensure there is no traffic transmitted on DUT LAG_3
- Disable/deactive laser on ATE port2; All LAG_2 members are either down (port2) or
set with forwarding-viable=FALSE
- Ensure ISIS adjacency is UP on DUT LAG_2 and ATE LAG_2
- Ensure there is no traffic transmitted out of DUT ports 2-7 (LAG_2)
- ensure that traffic is received on all port3-7 and delivered to ATE LAG_1
- ensure there are no packet losses in steady state (no congestion) for
traffic from ATE LAG_2 to ATE LAG_1 (pfx_1).
- ensure there are no packet losses in steady state (no congestion) for
traffic from ATE LAG_1 to ATE LAG_3 (pfx_2, pfx3).
- Ensure there is no traffic received on DUT LAG_3
- Ensure that traffic from ATE port1 to pfx2, pfx3 are transmitted via DUT
LAG3
- Ensure that traffic from ATE port1 to pfx4 are discarded on DUT
- Make the forwarding-viable transitions from FALSE --> TRUE on a ports 7
within the LAG_2 on the DUT
- ensure that only DUT port 7 of LAG ports has bidirectional traffic.
- Ensure there is no traffic transmitted out of DUT ports 2-6
- ensure that traffic is received on all port3-7 and delivered to ATE port1
- ensure there are no packet losses in steady state (no congestion).
- Ensure there is no traffic received on DUT LAG_3
- Ensure there is no traffic transmitted on DUT LAG_3
- Enable/activate laser on ATE port2; Make the forwarding-viable transitions
from FALSE --> TRUE on a ports 3-7

- For ISIS cost of LAG_2 equall to ISIS cost of LAG_3
- Run traffic:
- From prefix pfx1 to all three: pfx2, pfx3, pfx4
- From prefix pfx2 to: pfx1
- Make the forwarding-viable transitions from TRUE --> FALSE on ports 3-7
within the LAG_2 on the DUT
- ensure that only DUT port 2 of LAG_2 and all ports of LAG_3 ports has bidirectional
traffic. The traffic split between LAG_2 and LAG_3 should be 50:50.
- Ensure there is no traffic transmitted out of DUT ports 3-7
- ensure that traffic is received on all port2-7 and ports8-9 and delivered to ATE port1
- ensure there are no packet losses in steady state (no congestion).
- Disable/deactive laser on ATE port2; All LAG_2 members are either down (port2) or
set with forwarding-viable=FALSE.
- Ensure ISIS adjacency is UP on DUT LAG_2 and ATE LAG_2
- Ensure there is no traffic transmitted out of DUT ports 2-7 (LAG_2)
- ensure that traffic received on all port3-7 and ports8-9 is delivered to ATE LAG_1
- ensure there are no packet losses in steady state (no congestion) for
traffic from ATE LAG_2, LAG_3 to ATE LAG_1 (pfx_1).
- ensure there are no packet losses in steady state (no congestion) for
traffic from ATE LAG_1 to ATE LAG_3 (pfx_2, pfx3).
- Ensure that traffic from ATE port1 to pfx2, pfx3 are transmitted via DUT
LAG3
- Ensure that traffic from ATE port1 to pfx4 are discarded on DUT
- Make the forwarding-viable transitions from FALSE --> TRUE on a ports 7
within the LAG_2 on the DUT
- ensure that only DUT port 7 of LAG_2 and all ports of LAG_3 ports has bidirectional traffic.
- Ensure there is no traffic transmitted out of DUT ports 2-6
- ensure that traffic received on all port3-7 and ports8-9 is delivered to ATE port1
- ensure there are no packet losses in steady state (no congestion).
- Enable/activate laser on ATE port2; Make the forwarding-viable transitions
from FALSE --> TRUE on a ports 3-6

### Deviation option

It is foreseen that implementation may drop ISIS adjacency if all members of LAG
are set with forwarding-viable = FALSE. This scenario may be
handled via the yet to be defined deviation `logicalInterfaceUPonNonViableAll`.

## Config Parameter coverage

- /interfaces/interface/ethernet/config/aggregate-id
- /interfaces/interface/ethernet/config/forwarding-viable
- /interfaces/interface/aggregation/config/lag-type
- /lacp/config/system-priority
- /lacp/interfaces/interface/config/name
- /lacp/interfaces/interface/config/interval
- /lacp/interfaces/interface/config/lacp-mode
- /lacp/interfaces/interface/config/system-id-mac
- /lacp/interfaces/interface/config/system-priority

## Telemetry Parameter coverage

None

## Protocol/RPC Parameter coverage

None

## Minimum DUT platform requirement

vRX


0 comments on commit ec54355

Please sign in to comment.