-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alpha and kappa are a bit too close to their latin lookalikes #71
Comments
For italic a, we can switch to double storey variant. Not sure what to do for san-serif k/kappa. |
Feel free to submit such a change. |
how does one edit a .glyph? (new to this, sorry) |
basically yeah |
Maybe @Mercury13 could draw it. |
This was closed automatically when the kappa PR was merged, but alpha is still open. |
I was surprised to see the lowercase alpha so similar to the lowercase a. If a new sans alpha is drawn, I suggest it get added to Noto Sans LGC as the default glyph and the current sans alpha be moved to being an alternative. |
The Greek in Noto Sans was updated a couple of years ago. Are those not adequate? |
Wow that was a fast reply! The Greek in Noto Sans seems adequate to me. Obviously a Greek speaker would read the lowercase alpha correctly, but I feel like a lowercase alpha should look closer to its Noto Serif counterpart. At least in my opinion. What do the Unicode docs say about it? |
@MAZ06 is absolutely right. Need mathematical alpha. |
We seem to be using a mix of the old and new Greek, I opened #81 to track this. |
From left to right: a, alpha, k, kappa
Both could use some further "flourishes" to make them more distinct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: