Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tune workflows #113

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024
Merged

Tune workflows #113

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

roman-khimov
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

It's supposed to be a bit faster at least.

Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <[email protected]>
Otherwise each of our test jobs uploads coverage profile to Codecov which
make zero sense and actually can lead to misleading results.

Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.72%. Comparing base (ca4f328) to head (f11740a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #113   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.72%   62.72%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        1532     1532           
=======================================
  Hits          961      961           
  Misses        504      504           
  Partials       67       67           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@AnnaShaleva AnnaShaleva merged commit 45ef355 into master Apr 24, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
@AnnaShaleva AnnaShaleva deleted the tune-workflows branch April 24, 2024 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants