Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rm/Drop placement code copy #2478

Merged

Conversation

carpawell
Copy link
Member

It was added only due to a temporary SDK's interface problem. SDK RC10 has solved it.
NOTE: generally, the placement for container estimations changed with this commit: another pivot is used. We do this change cause SDK used to have a bug related to the placement func and placement changes are expected after RC9 -> RC10 update anyway.

@carpawell carpawell self-assigned this Aug 8, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2478 (b95dc14) into master (1684eee) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head b95dc14 differs from pull request most recent head 59a8b5a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 59a8b5a to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2478      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   29.26%   29.29%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         399      399              
  Lines       30390    30346      -44     
==========================================
- Hits         8893     8891       -2     
+ Misses      20761    20719      -42     
  Partials      736      736              
Files Changed Coverage Δ
cmd/neofs-node/container.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@carpawell
Copy link
Member Author

Waits for #2470.

@cthulhu-rider
Copy link
Contributor

Waits for #2470.

rdy

@carpawell carpawell force-pushed the rm/drop-custom-placement-code branch from ee1ce55 to f33a730 Compare August 10, 2023 12:07
@carpawell carpawell marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2023 12:07
@roman-khimov
Copy link
Member

CHANGELOG!

@carpawell
Copy link
Member Author

CHANGELOG!

You mean changed placement? Copy-paste/removal of the SDK's code is not needed to be changelogged, IMO.

@roman-khimov
Copy link
Member

Yeah, I'm not sure it affects users in any way, but it's a change and formally even a protocol-level one (old nodes compute these things differently).

@carpawell carpawell force-pushed the rm/drop-custom-placement-code branch from f33a730 to 34ee6fb Compare August 10, 2023 18:48
It was added only due to a temporary SDK's interface problem. SDK RC10 has
solved it.
NOTE: generally, the placement for container estimations changed with this
commit: another pivot is used. We do this change cause SDK used to have a
bug related to the placement func and placement changes are expected
after RC9 -> RC10 update anyway.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
@carpawell carpawell force-pushed the rm/drop-custom-placement-code branch from 34ee6fb to 59a8b5a Compare August 10, 2023 18:49
@roman-khimov roman-khimov merged commit 21e9d2a into nspcc-dev:master Aug 10, 2023
7 of 8 checks passed
@carpawell carpawell deleted the rm/drop-custom-placement-code branch August 15, 2023 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants