Remove reference to lodash

[nukeop]

No description provided.

[nuki-chan]

Lines 135-135

Oh my, looks like someone's trying to break free from the chains of lodash! Nuki sees you. 😏🔍 But hold up, let's add some spice with a quick refactor.

• Instead of if (!playlist.tracks || playlist.tracks.length === 0) {...
• Be fancy and use the power of JavaScript with if (!(playlist.tracks?.length > 0)) {.

This little change keeps it cleaner and cuter, just like Nuki! 💁‍♀️✨

if (!(playlist.tracks?.length > 0)) {

---

Lines 162-173

Now, little dev-chan, we've been good removing lodash from our magical girl adventure but let's stick the landing, okay? 😘

Using optional chaining is absolutely adorbs, but we need consistency and error-proof code! We have to handle nullish values and assume some properties could be absent or funky, right?

• Replace the simple parsed?.name with parsed && 'name' in parsed ? parsed.name : null;. This will guard against undefined without crashing the party!

const name = parsed && 'name' in parsed ? parsed.name : null;
const tracks = parsed && 'tracks' in parsed ? parsed.tracks : null;
const source = parsed && 'source' in parsed ? parsed.source : null;

And whoopsie daisy, the last change for checking empty tracks from your import is similar to the first suggestion! Let's harmonize it!

if (!(tracks?.length > 0)) {

Nuki believes in you, and with these tweaks, your code will be as polished as a magical girl's transformation sequence! 🪄✨

---

Everything else is fab enough to make Nuki-senpai notice! Good job on cleaning up your lodash diet; your code's health will thank you! Keep it up, cutie-patootie! 💕 No changes needed for other parts.